2010American Journal of Rhinology and AllergyRequires access

Use of Cold Dry Air Provocation with Acoustic Rhinometry in Detecting Nonspecific Nasal Hyperreactivity

Young Hyo Kim, Yoon Suk Oh, Kyu Jin Kim, Tae Young Jang

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cold dry air provocation is useful for evaluating nonspecific nasal hyperreactivity. However, there is no research on nasal volume and dimensions after cold dry air provocation. In this respect, acoustic rhinometry is a useful tool in objectively assessing nasal cavity volume and dimension. The goal of this study was to evaluate nonspecific hyperreactivity using cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry. METHODS: Cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry was performed on 21 healthy volunteers (group A), 24 patients with allergic rhinitis (group B), and 32 patients with nonallergic rhinitis (group C). The change in symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS), amount of rhinorrhea, and change of total nasal volume (TNV) and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) were measured in all three groups. RESULTS: The two patient groups showed greater change in nasal symptoms (VAS, 2.0 +/- 2.3 in group C versus 0.9 +/- 1.8 in group A), more rhinorrhea (0.4 +/- 0.7 g in group B and 0.3 +/- 0.3 g in group C versus 0.1 +/- 0.1 g in group A), and greater change in total nasal volume (TNV) and MCA. The patient group with history of nonspecific hyperreactivity showed more rhinorrhea (0.5 +/- 0.7 g versus 0.1 +/- 0.2 g) and greater change in TNV and MCA (TNV, 56.8 +/- 39.5% versus 18.0 +/- 17.0%; MCA, 86.6 +/- 81.0% versus 11.5 +/- 9.7%). CONCLUSION: Cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry could be a useful adjunct tool for detecting nonspecific hyperreactivity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Cold dry air provocation is useful for evaluating nonspecific nasal hyperreactivity. However, there is no research on nasal volume and dimensions after cold dry air provocation. In this respect, acoustic rhinometry is a useful tool in objectively assessing nasal cavity volume and dimension. The goal of this study was to evaluate nonspecific hyperreactivity using cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry. METHODS: Cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry was performed on 21 healthy volunteers (group A), 24 patients with allergic rhinitis (group B), and 32 patients with nonallergic rhinitis (group C). The change in symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS), amount of rhinorrhea, and change of total nasal volume (TNV) and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) were measured in all three groups. RESULTS: The two patient groups showed greater change in nasal symptoms (VAS, 2.0 +/- 2.3 in group C versus 0.9 +/- 1.8 in group A), more rhinorrhea (0.4 +/- 0.7 g in group B and 0.3 +/- 0.3 g in group C versus 0.1 +/- 0.1 g in group A), and greater change in total nasal volume (TNV) and MCA. The patient group with history of nonspecific hyperreactivity showed more rhinorrhea (0.5 +/- 0.7 g versus 0.1 +/- 0.2 g) and greater change in TNV and MCA (TNV, 56.8 +/- 39.5% versus 18.0 +/- 17.0%; MCA, 86.6 +/- 81.0% versus 11.5 +/- 9.7%). CONCLUSION: Cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry could be a useful adjunct tool for detecting nonspecific hyperreactivity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Cold dry air provocation is useful for evaluating nonspecific nasal hyperreactivity. However, there is no research on nasal volume and dimensions after cold dry air provocation. In this respect, acoustic rhinometry is a useful tool in objectively assessing nasal cavity volume and dimension. The goal of this study was to evaluate nonspecific hyperreactivity using cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry. METHODS: Cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry was performed on 21 healthy volunteers (group A), 24 patients with allergic rhinitis (group B), and 32 patients with nonallergic rhinitis (group C). The change in symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS), amount of rhinorrhea, and change of total nasal volume (TNV) and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) were measured in all three groups. RESULTS: The two patient groups showed greater change in nasal symptoms (VAS, 2.0 +/- 2.3 in group C versus 0.9 +/- 1.8 in group A), more rhinorrhea (0.4 +/- 0.7 g in group B and 0.3 +/- 0.3 g in group C versus 0.1 +/- 0.1 g in group A), and greater change in total nasal volume (TNV) and MCA. The patient group with history of nonspecific hyperreactivity showed more rhinorrhea (0.5 +/- 0.7 g versus 0.1 +/- 0.2 g) and greater change in TNV and MCA (TNV, 56.8 +/- 39.5% versus 18.0 +/- 17.0%; MCA, 86.6 +/- 81.0% versus 11.5 +/- 9.7%). CONCLUSION: Cold dry air provocation with acoustic rhinometry could be a useful adjunct tool for detecting nonspecific hyperreactivity.

Key concepts: Acoustic rhinometry, rhinorrhea, Provocation test, Medicine, Nasal provocation test, Nasal cavity, Nonallergic rhinitis, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of Cold Dry Air Provocation with Acoustic Rhinometry in Detecting Nonspecific Nasal Hyperreactivity — Research Paper | ScholarLens