1982•Canadian Journal of MicrobiologyRequires access

Response of Clostridium perfringens and its L form to bacteriocins of C. perfringens

David E. Mahony

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Clostridium perfringens strain No. 28 and its penicillin-induced stable L form were treated with 10 different bacteriocins of C. perfringens. Viable count and labelled amino acid incorporation experiments revealed that the L form was sensitive to two and possibly three bacteriocins to which the bacillus was not, while both forms were commonly sensitive to two other bacteriocins and resistant to five others. Adsorption of bacteriocin, immunity factors, or perhaps uptake of bacteriocin might be proposed to explain the responses of these organisms to bacteriocins.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Clostridium perfringens strain No. 28 and its penicillin-induced stable L form were treated with 10 different bacteriocins of C. perfringens. Viable count and labelled amino acid incorporation experiments revealed that the L form was sensitive to two and possibly three bacteriocins to which the bacillus was not, while both forms were commonly sensitive to two other bacteriocins and resistant to five others. Adsorption of bacteriocin, immunity factors, or perhaps uptake of bacteriocin might be proposed to explain the responses of these organisms to bacteriocins.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Clostridium perfringens strain No. 28 and its penicillin-induced stable L form were treated with 10 different bacteriocins of C. perfringens. Viable count and labelled amino acid incorporation experiments revealed that the L form was sensitive to two and possibly three bacteriocins to which the bacillus was not, while both forms were commonly sensitive to two other bacteriocins and resistant to five others. Adsorption of bacteriocin, immunity factors, or perhaps uptake of bacteriocin might be proposed to explain the responses of these organisms to bacteriocins.

Key concepts: Bacteriocin, Clostridium perfringens, Microbiology, Clostridium, Biology, Strain (injury), Penicillin, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Response of Clostridium perfringens and its L form to bacteriocins of C. perfringens — Research Paper | ScholarLens