1986•NASSP BulletinRequires access

Techniques of Evaluation of Principals and Assistant Principals: Four Case Studies

George B. Redfern

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Although the practice is commonplace, the techniques for evalu ating principals and assistant principals vary across the country. This author examines four of the most-used evaluation processes and procedures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although the practice is commonplace, the techniques for evalu ating principals and assistant principals vary across the country. This author examines four of the most-used evaluation processes and procedures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although the practice is commonplace, the techniques for evalu ating principals and assistant principals vary across the country. This author examines four of the most-used evaluation processes and procedures.

Key concepts: Psychology, Mathematics education, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Techniques of Evaluation of Principals and Assistant Principals: Four Case Studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens