1984Pesticide ScienceRequires access

Multiresidue method for captan, folpet, captafol, vinclozolin and iprodione on italian apples and pears by capillary gas–liquid chromatography with electron‐capture detection

Maria Barbina Taccheo, Claudio Spessotto, Bruno Bresin, Lucia Bagarolo

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Abstract A method is described for the simultaneous determination of residues of five fungicides used for foliar treatment of apple and pear trees, and for postharvest application. After extraction, the mixture of these fungicides is cleaned‐up on a ‘SEP PAK C18’ cartridge and the components determined by gas‐liquid chromatography with electron‐capture detection. The minimum detectable amounts in apples and pears, on a fresh weight basis, were 0.005mg kg−1 for vinclozolin, 0.010mg kg−1 for captan, folpet and iprodione, and 0.020 mg kg−1 for captafol. The percentage recovery for each fungicide (calculated by analysing four samples of untreated apples and pears, to which varying concentrations of each active ingredient had been added) varied for vinclozolin between 70.0 and 89.2, for captan between 72.0 and 83.8, for folpet between 73.0 and 93.0, for captafol between 70.8 and 91.8, and for iprodione between 75.1 and 97.1.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A method is described for the simultaneous determination of residues of five fungicides used for foliar treatment of apple and pear trees, and for postharvest application. After extraction, the mixture of these fungicides is cleaned‐up on a ‘SEP PAK C18’ cartridge and the components determined by gas‐liquid chromatography with electron‐capture detection. The minimum detectable amounts in apples and pears, on a fresh weight basis, were 0.005mg kg−1 for vinclozolin, 0.010mg kg−1 for captan, folpet and iprodione, and 0.020 mg kg−1 for captafol. The percentage recovery for each fungicide (calculated by analysing four samples of untreated apples and pears, to which varying concentrations of each active ingredient had been added) varied for vinclozolin between 70.0 and 89.2, for captan between 72.0 and 83.8, for folpet between 73.0 and 93.0, for captafol between 70.8 and 91.8, and for iprodione between 75.1 and 97.1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A method is described for the simultaneous determination of residues of five fungicides used for foliar treatment of apple and pear trees, and for postharvest application. After extraction, the mixture of these fungicides is cleaned‐up on a ‘SEP PAK C18’ cartridge and the components determined by gas‐liquid chromatography with electron‐capture detection. The minimum detectable amounts in apples and pears, on a fresh weight basis, were 0.005mg kg−1 for vinclozolin, 0.010mg kg−1 for captan, folpet and iprodione, and 0.020 mg kg−1 for captafol. The percentage recovery for each fungicide (calculated by analysing four samples of untreated apples and pears, to which varying concentrations of each active ingredient had been added) varied for vinclozolin between 70.0 and 89.2, for captan between 72.0 and 83.8, for folpet between 73.0 and 93.0, for captafol between 70.8 and 91.8, and for iprodione between 75.1 and 97.1.

Key concepts: Captan, Vinclozolin, Iprodione, Chemistry, Fungicide, Chromatography, Botany, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multiresidue method for captan, folpet, captafol, vinclozolin and iprodione on italian apples and pears by capillary gas–liquid chromatography with electron‐capture detection — Research Paper | ScholarLens