1976OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Alternatives for clean energy from coal

Elena Ferretti

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Even if U.S. consumption of coal were to double, it is estimated that recoverable reserves could last several hundred years. The disadvantages of coal are described: it is more difficult to handle than oil or gas; it contains varying amounts of ash, with the most critical deterrent at present being sulfur. The geographic location of U.S. coal deposits are shown and its ranks are described. Processes to obtain clean energy from coal are discussed, including: mining of low-sulfur coal; improved coal cleaning methods; high- and low-Btu gasification of coal; liquefaction of coal; stack gas scrubbing; advanced combustion methods; MHD applications; the production of methanol; and in-situ gasification of coal. For each application, the specific local conditions and economics will need to be examined to determine which system is favored. (MCW)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Even if U.S. consumption of coal were to double, it is estimated that recoverable reserves could last several hundred years. The disadvantages of coal are described: it is more difficult to handle than oil or gas; it contains varying amounts of ash, with the most critical deterrent at present being sulfur. The geographic location of U.S. coal deposits are shown and its ranks are described. Processes to obtain clean energy from coal are discussed, including: mining of low-sulfur coal; improved coal cleaning methods; high- and low-Btu gasification of coal; liquefaction of coal; stack gas scrubbing; advanced combustion methods; MHD applications; the production of methanol; and in-situ gasification of coal. For each application, the specific local conditions and economics will need to be examined to determine which system is favored. (MCW)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Even if U.S. consumption of coal were to double, it is estimated that recoverable reserves could last several hundred years. The disadvantages of coal are described: it is more difficult to handle than oil or gas; it contains varying amounts of ash, with the most critical deterrent at present being sulfur. The geographic location of U.S. coal deposits are shown and its ranks are described. Processes to obtain clean energy from coal are discussed, including: mining of low-sulfur coal; improved coal cleaning methods; high- and low-Btu gasification of coal; liquefaction of coal; stack gas scrubbing; advanced combustion methods; MHD applications; the production of methanol; and in-situ gasification of coal. For each application, the specific local conditions and economics will need to be examined to determine which system is favored. (MCW)

Key concepts: Coal, Clean coal technology, Clean coal, Waste management, Coal liquefaction, Coal gasification, Environmental science, Coal combustion products

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Alternatives for clean energy from coal — Research Paper | ScholarLens