2009NeurologyRequires access

Acute ischemic stroke

Mark Parsons, Ferdinand Miteff, Grant A. Bateman, Neil J. Spratt, Andre Loiselle, John Attia, Christopher Levi

Open publisher page 118 citations

Abstract

Background: Tenecteplase is a modified tissue plasminogen activator with a longer half-life and higher fibrin specificity than alteplase. Methods: We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, pilot study of 0.1 mg/kg IV tenecteplase given 3 to 6 hours after ischemic stroke onset. For a control group, we used patients contemporaneously treated with sub–3-hour 0.9 mg/kg IV alteplase following standard selection criteria. All patients underwent pretreatment and 24-hour perfusion/angiographic imaging with CT or MRI. Eligibility criteria for tenecteplase (but not alteplase) treatment included a perfusion lesion at least 20% greater than the infarct core, with an associated vessel occlusion. Primary outcomes, assessed blind to treatment group, were reperfusion (reduction in baseline–24-hour mean transit time lesion) and major vessel recanalization. Results: Fifteen patients received tenecteplase, and 35 patients received alteplase. The tenecteplase group had greater reperfusion (mean 74% vs 44% in the alteplase group, p = 0.01) and major vessel recanalization (10/15 tenecteplase vs 7/29 alteplase, p = 0.01). Despite later time to treatment, more tenecteplase patients (10/15 vs 7/35 alteplase, p = 0.001) had major neurologic improvement at 24 hours (NIH Stroke Scale reduction ≥8). Four of the alteplase patients and none of the tenecteplase patients had parenchymal hematoma at 24 hours. Conclusions: Tenecteplase 0.1 mg/kg, using advanced imaging guidance in an extended time window, may have significant biologic efficacy in acute ischemic stroke. The imaging selection differences between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups prevent a conclusive efficacy comparison. Nonetheless, these results lend support for randomized trials comparing tenecteplase with alteplase, preferably incorporating penumbral/angiographic imaging selection. CBV = cerebral blood volume; CTA = CT angiography; CTP = perfusion CT; DWI = diffusion-weighted echo-planar spin-echo sequence; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; MNI = major neurologic improvement; MR = magnetic resonance; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; MTT = mean transit time; NCCT = noncontrast CT; NIHSS = NIH Stroke Scale; PH = parenchymal hematoma; TIMI = Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Tenecteplase is a modified tissue plasminogen activator with a longer half-life and higher fibrin specificity than alteplase. Methods: We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, pilot study of 0.1 mg/kg IV tenecteplase given 3 to 6 hours after ischemic stroke onset. For a control group, we used patients contemporaneously treated with sub–3-hour 0.9 mg/kg IV alteplase following standard selection criteria. All patients underwent pretreatment and 24-hour perfusion/angiographic imaging with CT or MRI. Eligibility criteria for tenecteplase (but not alteplase) treatment included a perfusion lesion at least 20% greater than the infarct core, with an associated vessel occlusion. Primary outcomes, assessed blind to treatment group, were reperfusion (reduction in baseline–24-hour mean transit time lesion) and major vessel recanalization. Results: Fifteen patients received tenecteplase, and 35 patients received alteplase. The tenecteplase group had greater reperfusion (mean 74% vs 44% in the alteplase group, p = 0.01) and major vessel recanalization (10/15 tenecteplase vs 7/29 alteplase, p = 0.01). Despite later time to treatment, more tenecteplase patients (10/15 vs 7/35 alteplase, p = 0.001) had major neurologic improvement at 24 hours (NIH Stroke Scale reduction ≥8). Four of the alteplase patients and none of the tenecteplase patients had parenchymal hematoma at 24 hours. Conclusions: Tenecteplase 0.1 mg/kg, using advanced imaging guidance in an extended time window, may have significant biologic efficacy in acute ischemic stroke. The imaging selection differences between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups prevent a conclusive efficacy comparison. Nonetheless, these results lend support for randomized trials comparing tenecteplase with alteplase, preferably incorporating penumbral/angiographic imaging selection. CBV = cerebral blood volume; CTA = CT angiography; CTP = perfusion CT; DWI = diffusion-weighted echo-planar spin-echo sequence; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; MNI = major neurologic improvement; MR = magnetic resonance; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; MTT = mean transit time; NCCT = noncontrast CT; NIHSS = NIH Stroke Scale; PH = parenchymal hematoma; TIMI = Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 118 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Tenecteplase is a modified tissue plasminogen activator with a longer half-life and higher fibrin specificity than alteplase. Methods: We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, pilot study of 0.1 mg/kg IV tenecteplase given 3 to 6 hours after ischemic stroke onset. For a control group, we used patients contemporaneously treated with sub–3-hour 0.9 mg/kg IV alteplase following standard selection criteria. All patients underwent pretreatment and 24-hour perfusion/angiographic imaging with CT or MRI. Eligibility criteria for tenecteplase (but not alteplase) treatment included a perfusion lesion at least 20% greater than the infarct core, with an associated vessel occlusion. Primary outcomes, assessed blind to treatment group, were reperfusion (reduction in baseline–24-hour mean transit time lesion) and major vessel recanalization. Results: Fifteen patients received tenecteplase, and 35 patients received alteplase. The tenecteplase group had greater reperfusion (mean 74% vs 44% in the alteplase group, p = 0.01) and major vessel recanalization (10/15 tenecteplase vs 7/29 alteplase, p = 0.01). Despite later time to treatment, more tenecteplase patients (10/15 vs 7/35 alteplase, p = 0.001) had major neurologic improvement at 24 hours (NIH Stroke Scale reduction ≥8). Four of the alteplase patients and none of the tenecteplase patients had parenchymal hematoma at 24 hours. Conclusions: Tenecteplase 0.1 mg/kg, using advanced imaging guidance in an extended time window, may have significant biologic efficacy in acute ischemic stroke. The imaging selection differences between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups prevent a conclusive efficacy comparison. Nonetheless, these results lend support for randomized trials comparing tenecteplase with alteplase, preferably incorporating penumbral/angiographic imaging selection. CBV = cerebral blood volume; CTA = CT angiography; CTP = perfusion CT; DWI = diffusion-weighted echo-planar spin-echo sequence; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; MNI = major neurologic improvement; MR = magnetic resonance; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; MTT = mean transit time; NCCT = noncontrast CT; NIHSS = NIH Stroke Scale; PH = parenchymal hematoma; TIMI = Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

Key concepts: Tenecteplase, Medicine, Tissue plasminogen activator, Fibrinolytic agent, Stroke (engine), Thrombolysis, Perfusion, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Acute ischemic stroke — Research Paper | ScholarLens