1985•Drug Development and Industrial PharmacyRequires access

The Role of Institutional Review Boards in Facilitating Research, Marketing of Drugs and Devices, and Protecting Human Subjects

A. Holm, Julie Campbell

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Concern for outside review of medical research involving human subjects has been documented as far back as the early Nineteenth Century. It was not until 1966, however, when applicants for Public Health Service grant funding were subjected to such a requirement, that researchers were required to undergo review. Institutional Review Boards (IRB) are the bodies charged with performing the mandated screening functions by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for federally funded projects and by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the drug and device approval process.This paper explores an IRB's responsibilities under the HHS and FDA regulations generally, and emphasizes several critical attendant issues including: the manufacturer's IRB; IRB members' individual liability; compensation for research injuries; civil rights protections afforded subjects; impact upon academic and health practitioner research; and effect upon drug and device approvals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Concern for outside review of medical research involving human subjects has been documented as far back as the early Nineteenth Century. It was not until 1966, however, when applicants for Public Health Service grant funding were subjected to such a requirement, that researchers were required to undergo review. Institutional Review Boards (IRB) are the bodies charged with performing the mandated screening functions by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for federally funded projects and by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the drug and device approval process.This paper explores an IRB's responsibilities under the HHS and FDA regulations generally, and emphasizes several critical attendant issues including: the manufacturer's IRB; IRB members' individual liability; compensation for research injuries; civil rights protections afforded subjects; impact upon academic and health practitioner research; and effect upon drug and device approvals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Concern for outside review of medical research involving human subjects has been documented as far back as the early Nineteenth Century. It was not until 1966, however, when applicants for Public Health Service grant funding were subjected to such a requirement, that researchers were required to undergo review. Institutional Review Boards (IRB) are the bodies charged with performing the mandated screening functions by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for federally funded projects and by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the drug and device approval process.This paper explores an IRB's responsibilities under the HHS and FDA regulations generally, and emphasizes several critical attendant issues including: the manufacturer's IRB; IRB members' individual liability; compensation for research injuries; civil rights protections afforded subjects; impact upon academic and health practitioner research; and effect upon drug and device approvals.

Key concepts: Human services, Food and drug administration, Institutional review board, Liability, Business, Medicine, Clinical research, Public relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Role of Institutional Review Boards in Facilitating Research, Marketing of Drugs and Devices, and Protecting Human Subjects — Research Paper | ScholarLens