1966•Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresRequires access

Tests and combination of satellite determinations of the gravity field with gravimetry

W. M. Kaula

Open publisher page 125 citations

Abstract

Six solutions for the tesseral harmonic coefficients of the geopotential from analyses of satellite orbits were compared with terrestrial gravimetry in the form of mean free-air anomalies of squares 300 nautical miles (n.m) on a side. Statistical parameters calculated were the mean-square values of each type of determination as well as the mean-square difference for different samples based on the number of observations in the 300-n.m. square. The study showed significant variation in quality between different solutions, the best being that recently obtained from camera tracking of satellites by Gaposhkin. The arithmetic mean of four independent satellite solutions was better than any single solution. This combined satellite solution was used in an adjustment with the gravimetry to obtain a single best solution, given herein in the forms of a geoid map; spherical harmonic coefficients to degree and order 12, 12; and gravity anomalies at 10° intervals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Six solutions for the tesseral harmonic coefficients of the geopotential from analyses of satellite orbits were compared with terrestrial gravimetry in the form of mean free-air anomalies of squares 300 nautical miles (n.m) on a side. Statistical parameters calculated were the mean-square values of each type of determination as well as the mean-square difference for different samples based on the number of observations in the 300-n.m. square. The study showed significant variation in quality between different solutions, the best being that recently obtained from camera tracking of satellites by Gaposhkin. The arithmetic mean of four independent satellite solutions was better than any single solution. This combined satellite solution was used in an adjustment with the gravimetry to obtain a single best solution, given herein in the forms of a geoid map; spherical harmonic coefficients to degree and order 12, 12; and gravity anomalies at 10° intervals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 125 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Six solutions for the tesseral harmonic coefficients of the geopotential from analyses of satellite orbits were compared with terrestrial gravimetry in the form of mean free-air anomalies of squares 300 nautical miles (n.m) on a side. Statistical parameters calculated were the mean-square values of each type of determination as well as the mean-square difference for different samples based on the number of observations in the 300-n.m. square. The study showed significant variation in quality between different solutions, the best being that recently obtained from camera tracking of satellites by Gaposhkin. The arithmetic mean of four independent satellite solutions was better than any single solution. This combined satellite solution was used in an adjustment with the gravimetry to obtain a single best solution, given herein in the forms of a geoid map; spherical harmonic coefficients to degree and order 12, 12; and gravity anomalies at 10° intervals.

Key concepts: Gravimetry, Geopotential, Geoid, Geodesy, Gravitational field, Satellite, Spherical harmonics, Undulation of the geoid

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tests and combination of satellite determinations of the gravity field with gravimetry — Research Paper | ScholarLens