2004Digestive EndoscopyRequires access

ASSESSMENT OF MISS AND INCIDENCE RATES OF NEOPLASTIC POLYPS AT COLONOSCOPY

Kunio Kasugai, Mitsuki Miyata, Takashi Hashimoto, Isami Todoroki, Shigeru Tsutsui, Fumitaka Nagase, Yuko Wada, Mari Sato, Kuniyuki Takahashi, Yoshifumi Tokura, Tamotsu Kanazawa, Shinichi Kakumu

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Background: The incidence rate after a colonoscopic polypectomy includes the true incidence rate of new polyp formation and miss rate of polyps at the initial colonoscopy. It is therefore important to assess accurate incidence rates of polyps as well as those of missing polyps with colocoscopy. Methods: Six hundred and eighty‐eight patients who underwent total colonoscopy twice within 30 days were investigated to determine the miss rates of neoplastic polyps under colonoscopy. The cumulative incidence rates of neoplasm were evaluated by the Kaplan‐Meier method in another series of investigations on 864 patients who underwent surveillance total colonoscopy over 31 days. Results: In 157 (22.8%) patients out of 688, 200 neoplastic lesions (all adenomas) were missed during the first examination. The miss rate was 16% for adenomas ≤ 5 mm and 2% for adenomas > 10 mm. The miss rates of patients with 0, 1, 2, or > 2 neoplastic polyps on the first examination was 5.3%, 19.6%, 23.5% and 35.5%, respectively. One year cumulative incidence rates of patients with 1, 2, or > 2 neoplastic polyps on the first examination were 18.4%, 21.1% and 34.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Detection of multiple neoplasms on index colonoscopy predicts a high miss rate and cumulative incidence rate on surveillance colonoscopy. A substantial proportion of neoplasms detected at nearly 1‐year postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy were missed at the initial total colonoscopy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The incidence rate after a colonoscopic polypectomy includes the true incidence rate of new polyp formation and miss rate of polyps at the initial colonoscopy. It is therefore important to assess accurate incidence rates of polyps as well as those of missing polyps with colocoscopy. Methods: Six hundred and eighty‐eight patients who underwent total colonoscopy twice within 30 days were investigated to determine the miss rates of neoplastic polyps under colonoscopy. The cumulative incidence rates of neoplasm were evaluated by the Kaplan‐Meier method in another series of investigations on 864 patients who underwent surveillance total colonoscopy over 31 days. Results: In 157 (22.8%) patients out of 688, 200 neoplastic lesions (all adenomas) were missed during the first examination. The miss rate was 16% for adenomas ≤ 5 mm and 2% for adenomas > 10 mm. The miss rates of patients with 0, 1, 2, or > 2 neoplastic polyps on the first examination was 5.3%, 19.6%, 23.5% and 35.5%, respectively. One year cumulative incidence rates of patients with 1, 2, or > 2 neoplastic polyps on the first examination were 18.4%, 21.1% and 34.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Detection of multiple neoplasms on index colonoscopy predicts a high miss rate and cumulative incidence rate on surveillance colonoscopy. A substantial proportion of neoplasms detected at nearly 1‐year postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy were missed at the initial total colonoscopy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The incidence rate after a colonoscopic polypectomy includes the true incidence rate of new polyp formation and miss rate of polyps at the initial colonoscopy. It is therefore important to assess accurate incidence rates of polyps as well as those of missing polyps with colocoscopy. Methods: Six hundred and eighty‐eight patients who underwent total colonoscopy twice within 30 days were investigated to determine the miss rates of neoplastic polyps under colonoscopy. The cumulative incidence rates of neoplasm were evaluated by the Kaplan‐Meier method in another series of investigations on 864 patients who underwent surveillance total colonoscopy over 31 days. Results: In 157 (22.8%) patients out of 688, 200 neoplastic lesions (all adenomas) were missed during the first examination. The miss rate was 16% for adenomas ≤ 5 mm and 2% for adenomas > 10 mm. The miss rates of patients with 0, 1, 2, or > 2 neoplastic polyps on the first examination was 5.3%, 19.6%, 23.5% and 35.5%, respectively. One year cumulative incidence rates of patients with 1, 2, or > 2 neoplastic polyps on the first examination were 18.4%, 21.1% and 34.2%, respectively. Conclusion: Detection of multiple neoplasms on index colonoscopy predicts a high miss rate and cumulative incidence rate on surveillance colonoscopy. A substantial proportion of neoplasms detected at nearly 1‐year postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy were missed at the initial total colonoscopy.

Key concepts: Colonoscopy, Medicine, Incidence (geometry), Polypectomy, Cumulative incidence, Gastroenterology, Adenoma, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ASSESSMENT OF MISS AND INCIDENCE RATES OF NEOPLASTIC POLYPS AT COLONOSCOPY — Research Paper | ScholarLens