1983Scandinavian AudiologyRequires access

The Acoustic Reflex Threshold in Relation to Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

Fredrik Lindgren, Roland Nilsson, A. Axelsson

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

In 100 consecutive cases with severe noise-induced hearing loss, pure-tone threshold measurements revealed symmetric hearing losses with maximum shifts at 4000 and 6000 Hz. Acoustic reflex measurements showed that few patients had an elevated pathologic reflex threshold. In contrast, we found a depressed acoustic reflex sensation level (i.e., the difference, in decibels, between pure-tone threshold and acoustic reflex threshold) suggesting a cochlear localization of the injury. Consequently, the probability of retro-cochlear involvement was small, or the cochlear component dominated the retro-cochlear one. The relation between the absence of the acoustic reflex and the degree of hearing loss showed that even at a pure-tone threshold of 80 dB HL, 50% of the ears still had an elicitable acoustic reflex. Statistical analysis yielded a significant correlation between acoustic reflex sensation level and speech discrimination, but no such correlation between acoustic reflex threshold and speech discrimination. We suggest that acoustic reflex sensation level should be a complement to the acoustic reflex threshold in order to distinguish between different localizations of sensorineural hearing losses.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 100 consecutive cases with severe noise-induced hearing loss, pure-tone threshold measurements revealed symmetric hearing losses with maximum shifts at 4000 and 6000 Hz. Acoustic reflex measurements showed that few patients had an elevated pathologic reflex threshold. In contrast, we found a depressed acoustic reflex sensation level (i.e., the difference, in decibels, between pure-tone threshold and acoustic reflex threshold) suggesting a cochlear localization of the injury. Consequently, the probability of retro-cochlear involvement was small, or the cochlear component dominated the retro-cochlear one. The relation between the absence of the acoustic reflex and the degree of hearing loss showed that even at a pure-tone threshold of 80 dB HL, 50% of the ears still had an elicitable acoustic reflex. Statistical analysis yielded a significant correlation between acoustic reflex sensation level and speech discrimination, but no such correlation between acoustic reflex threshold and speech discrimination. We suggest that acoustic reflex sensation level should be a complement to the acoustic reflex threshold in order to distinguish between different localizations of sensorineural hearing losses.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 100 consecutive cases with severe noise-induced hearing loss, pure-tone threshold measurements revealed symmetric hearing losses with maximum shifts at 4000 and 6000 Hz. Acoustic reflex measurements showed that few patients had an elevated pathologic reflex threshold. In contrast, we found a depressed acoustic reflex sensation level (i.e., the difference, in decibels, between pure-tone threshold and acoustic reflex threshold) suggesting a cochlear localization of the injury. Consequently, the probability of retro-cochlear involvement was small, or the cochlear component dominated the retro-cochlear one. The relation between the absence of the acoustic reflex and the degree of hearing loss showed that even at a pure-tone threshold of 80 dB HL, 50% of the ears still had an elicitable acoustic reflex. Statistical analysis yielded a significant correlation between acoustic reflex sensation level and speech discrimination, but no such correlation between acoustic reflex threshold and speech discrimination. We suggest that acoustic reflex sensation level should be a complement to the acoustic reflex threshold in order to distinguish between different localizations of sensorineural hearing losses.

Key concepts: Acoustic reflex, Audiology, Reflex, Absolute threshold of hearing, Sensorineural hearing loss, Hearing loss, Noise (video), Auditory fatigue

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Acoustic Reflex Threshold in Relation to Noise-Induced Hearing Loss — Research Paper | ScholarLens