2012CIC Cuadernos de Información y ComunicaciónOpen access

Comunicación para el Desarrollo Humano: buscando la transformación social

Raquel Martínez-Gómez, Pinar Agudíez

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Communication is one of the “conditions of possibility” of Human Development. The folds of the infocommunicational map, that is linking us today, define a share space between mainstream media (mass society) and social media (digital society). An intricate space which is also weaved by associated citizenship or individuals who are constructing the right to communication. On this map, development has been located from several and different places or spheres of sense: Postindustrial Society (Bell), Informational and Network Society (Castells), Techno-sciences Society (Virilio), Advanced Technology Society (Negroponte), Information Society (OCDE), or Digital Society of Knowledge (European Union). All of them have constituted topographies of development, and consequently, of knowledge, information and communication. These four decades of theoretical contributions to the map of communication in development show the pertinence of reopening the debate about democratization of information (Mcbride) and the people’s right to communicate (Hamelink) because we are in the same place as we were in the seventies: behind the impermeability of a technological transfer order that consolidates (and maintains) similar asymmetries and structural differences.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Communication is one of the “conditions of possibility” of Human Development. The folds of the infocommunicational map, that is linking us today, define a share space between mainstream media (mass society) and social media (digital society). An intricate space which is also weaved by associated citizenship or individuals who are constructing the right to communication. On this map, development has been located from several and different places or spheres of sense: Postindustrial Society (Bell), Informational and Network Society (Castells), Techno-sciences Society (Virilio), Advanced Technology Society (Negroponte), Information Society (OCDE), or Digital Society of Knowledge (European Union). All of them have constituted topographies of development, and consequently, of knowledge, information and communication. These four decades of theoretical contributions to the map of communication in development show the pertinence of reopening the debate about democratization of information (Mcbride) and the people’s right to communicate (Hamelink) because we are in the same place as we were in the seventies: behind the impermeability of a technological transfer order that consolidates (and maintains) similar asymmetries and structural differences.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Communication is one of the “conditions of possibility” of Human Development. The folds of the infocommunicational map, that is linking us today, define a share space between mainstream media (mass society) and social media (digital society). An intricate space which is also weaved by associated citizenship or individuals who are constructing the right to communication. On this map, development has been located from several and different places or spheres of sense: Postindustrial Society (Bell), Informational and Network Society (Castells), Techno-sciences Society (Virilio), Advanced Technology Society (Negroponte), Information Society (OCDE), or Digital Society of Knowledge (European Union). All of them have constituted topographies of development, and consequently, of knowledge, information and communication. These four decades of theoretical contributions to the map of communication in development show the pertinence of reopening the debate about democratization of information (Mcbride) and the people’s right to communicate (Hamelink) because we are in the same place as we were in the seventies: behind the impermeability of a technological transfer order that consolidates (and maintains) similar asymmetries and structural differences.

Key concepts: Information society, Network society, Post-industrial society, Digital society, Contemporary society, Mainstream, Knowledge society, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comunicación para el Desarrollo Humano: buscando la transformación social — Research Paper | ScholarLens