2014International Journal of Management ExcellenceOpen access

Implementation of Solvency II and its potential impact on market of insurance companies

Petra Korbasová

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The ambition of this article is to demonstrate positives, but also the fall back of the Solvency II and of the delayed and uncoordinated implementation among the national regulators. This article summarizes the trends in insurance market regulation following the introduction and consequent implementation of the Solvency II as a new regulatory framework for the insurance companies. Solvency II represents a critical step in terms of tightening of the regulatory framework for the insurance providers, especially by setting stricter rules for reporting and capital adequacy. On the other hand, Solvency II represent a major risk of increased costs related to implementation of the Solvency II principles in day to day business reporting of the insurance companies potentially harming status quo of the insurance market as the costs related to implementation of Solvency II and their reporting to national regulators.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The ambition of this article is to demonstrate positives, but also the fall back of the Solvency II and of the delayed and uncoordinated implementation among the national regulators. This article summarizes the trends in insurance market regulation following the introduction and consequent implementation of the Solvency II as a new regulatory framework for the insurance companies. Solvency II represents a critical step in terms of tightening of the regulatory framework for the insurance providers, especially by setting stricter rules for reporting and capital adequacy. On the other hand, Solvency II represent a major risk of increased costs related to implementation of the Solvency II principles in day to day business reporting of the insurance companies potentially harming status quo of the insurance market as the costs related to implementation of Solvency II and their reporting to national regulators.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The ambition of this article is to demonstrate positives, but also the fall back of the Solvency II and of the delayed and uncoordinated implementation among the national regulators. This article summarizes the trends in insurance market regulation following the introduction and consequent implementation of the Solvency II as a new regulatory framework for the insurance companies. Solvency II represents a critical step in terms of tightening of the regulatory framework for the insurance providers, especially by setting stricter rules for reporting and capital adequacy. On the other hand, Solvency II represent a major risk of increased costs related to implementation of the Solvency II principles in day to day business reporting of the insurance companies potentially harming status quo of the insurance market as the costs related to implementation of Solvency II and their reporting to national regulators.

Key concepts: Solvency, Business, Capital requirement, Status quo, Actuarial science, Solvency ratio, Finance, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implementation of Solvency II and its potential impact on market of insurance companies — Research Paper | ScholarLens