Vectorcardiographic monitoring of patients with acute myocardial infarction and chronic bundle branch block
Peter Eriksson, Karl Andersen, Karl Swedberg, Mikael Dellborg
Abstract
Peter Eriksson, Karl Andersen, Karl Swedberg, Mikael Dellborg
Abstract
AIMS: This study was set up to describe vectorcardiographic patterns in patients with bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients admitted to the coronary care unit with bundle-branch block and suspected acute myocardial infarction were monitored by dynamic vectorcardiography with trend analysis. In 28 patients, a clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was made. In patients with left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction, the pattern of QRS vector-difference evolution was similar to that in patients with the narrow QRS complex, while ST vector-magnitude changes increased over time. Using a cut-off value for QRS vector-difference at 12 h of more than 20 microVs and a specific trend curve pattern, acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block could be diagnosed with an accuracy of 71%. For patients with right bundle branch block, using a maximum ST vector-magnitude of > 200 microV during the first 4 h, acute myocardial infarction could be diagnosed with a 78% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that dynamic vectorcardiography is a valuable tool in diagnosing and monitoring acute myocardial infarction in patients with bundle branch block.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIMS: This study was set up to describe vectorcardiographic patterns in patients with bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients admitted to the coronary care unit with bundle-branch block and suspected acute myocardial infarction were monitored by dynamic vectorcardiography with trend analysis. In 28 patients, a clinical diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was made. In patients with left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction, the pattern of QRS vector-difference evolution was similar to that in patients with the narrow QRS complex, while ST vector-magnitude changes increased over time. Using a cut-off value for QRS vector-difference at 12 h of more than 20 microVs and a specific trend curve pattern, acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block could be diagnosed with an accuracy of 71%. For patients with right bundle branch block, using a maximum ST vector-magnitude of > 200 microV during the first 4 h, acute myocardial infarction could be diagnosed with a 78% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that dynamic vectorcardiography is a valuable tool in diagnosing and monitoring acute myocardial infarction in patients with bundle branch block.
Key concepts: Medicine, Cardiology, Myocardial infarction, Internal medicine, Left bundle branch block, Bundle branch block, Electrocardiography, Heart failure