1966Journal of Pharmacy and PharmacologyRequires access

The “nicotinic” and “muscarinic” receptors of the urinary bladder of the guinea-pig

G. B. Chesher, Barbara James

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Abstract The action of acetylcholine and nicotine on the urinary bladder of the guinea-pig has been examined using three techniques of physiological denervation. Nicotine was neurogenic and equiactive concentrations of acetylcholine were myogenic. Whilst acetylcholine has both “muscarinic” and “nicotinic” effects on the guinea-pig bladder, the concentration required to stimulate the nicotinic receptors was approximately 100 times that required for the muscarinic receptors. These results indicate that the nicotinic receptors are confined to nervous tissue, and do not support the suggestion that there might be non-neuronal nicotinic receptors in the bladder musculature of the guinea-pig. The possibility of a non-cholinergic component in the post-ganglionic parasympathetic fibres to the bladder should still be considered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The action of acetylcholine and nicotine on the urinary bladder of the guinea-pig has been examined using three techniques of physiological denervation. Nicotine was neurogenic and equiactive concentrations of acetylcholine were myogenic. Whilst acetylcholine has both “muscarinic” and “nicotinic” effects on the guinea-pig bladder, the concentration required to stimulate the nicotinic receptors was approximately 100 times that required for the muscarinic receptors. These results indicate that the nicotinic receptors are confined to nervous tissue, and do not support the suggestion that there might be non-neuronal nicotinic receptors in the bladder musculature of the guinea-pig. The possibility of a non-cholinergic component in the post-ganglionic parasympathetic fibres to the bladder should still be considered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The action of acetylcholine and nicotine on the urinary bladder of the guinea-pig has been examined using three techniques of physiological denervation. Nicotine was neurogenic and equiactive concentrations of acetylcholine were myogenic. Whilst acetylcholine has both “muscarinic” and “nicotinic” effects on the guinea-pig bladder, the concentration required to stimulate the nicotinic receptors was approximately 100 times that required for the muscarinic receptors. These results indicate that the nicotinic receptors are confined to nervous tissue, and do not support the suggestion that there might be non-neuronal nicotinic receptors in the bladder musculature of the guinea-pig. The possibility of a non-cholinergic component in the post-ganglionic parasympathetic fibres to the bladder should still be considered.

Key concepts: Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, Nicotinic agonist, Nicotine, Acetylcholine, Ganglion type nicotinic receptor, Cholinergic, Acetylcholine receptor, Receptor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The “nicotinic” and “muscarinic” receptors of the urinary bladder of the guinea-pig — Research Paper | ScholarLens