2002NematologyRequires access

The taxonomy of the family Xyalidae Chitwood, 1951 (Monhysterida: Nematoda): a cladistic analysis

John W. H. Trueman, W. L. Nicholas

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

Abstract A cladistic analysis of the family Xyalidae has been carried out, with selected Monhysteridae and Sphaerolaimidae as presumptive outgroups. Forty nine characters, taken from published descriptions, were scored for 91 species from 33 genera. The way in which the characters were coded is illustrated by drawings and graphs. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted with the programs PAUP*4.0d65 and PAUP*4.0b2. Neighbour-joining and parsimony trees were constructed and the preferred consensus parsimony tree is presented. The tree has been divided into 15 groups for purposes of discussion. All eight species of Monhysteridae form a separate clade consistent with outgroup status, but the four species of Sphaerolaimidae are not separated from Xyalidae. Several of the Daptonema species, Pseudosteineria plus Steineria, and Rhynchonematinae form three well supported clades. Other groupings are much less well supported and are presumed to be paraphyletic. Many published descriptions do not include sufficient detail to allow relationships to be determined and suggestions are made as to data which should be included in future taxonomic descriptions of Xyalidae.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A cladistic analysis of the family Xyalidae has been carried out, with selected Monhysteridae and Sphaerolaimidae as presumptive outgroups. Forty nine characters, taken from published descriptions, were scored for 91 species from 33 genera. The way in which the characters were coded is illustrated by drawings and graphs. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted with the programs PAUP*4.0d65 and PAUP*4.0b2. Neighbour-joining and parsimony trees were constructed and the preferred consensus parsimony tree is presented. The tree has been divided into 15 groups for purposes of discussion. All eight species of Monhysteridae form a separate clade consistent with outgroup status, but the four species of Sphaerolaimidae are not separated from Xyalidae. Several of the Daptonema species, Pseudosteineria plus Steineria, and Rhynchonematinae form three well supported clades. Other groupings are much less well supported and are presumed to be paraphyletic. Many published descriptions do not include sufficient detail to allow relationships to be determined and suggestions are made as to data which should be included in future taxonomic descriptions of Xyalidae.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A cladistic analysis of the family Xyalidae has been carried out, with selected Monhysteridae and Sphaerolaimidae as presumptive outgroups. Forty nine characters, taken from published descriptions, were scored for 91 species from 33 genera. The way in which the characters were coded is illustrated by drawings and graphs. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted with the programs PAUP*4.0d65 and PAUP*4.0b2. Neighbour-joining and parsimony trees were constructed and the preferred consensus parsimony tree is presented. The tree has been divided into 15 groups for purposes of discussion. All eight species of Monhysteridae form a separate clade consistent with outgroup status, but the four species of Sphaerolaimidae are not separated from Xyalidae. Several of the Daptonema species, Pseudosteineria plus Steineria, and Rhynchonematinae form three well supported clades. Other groupings are much less well supported and are presumed to be paraphyletic. Many published descriptions do not include sufficient detail to allow relationships to be determined and suggestions are made as to data which should be included in future taxonomic descriptions of Xyalidae.

Key concepts: Paraphyly, Cladistics, Biology, Clade, Taxonomy (biology), Monophyly, Ingroups and outgroups, Phylogenetic tree

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The taxonomy of the family Xyalidae Chitwood, 1951 (Monhysterida: Nematoda): a cladistic analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens