2015The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal MedicineRequires access

Borderline amniotic fluid index and perinatal outcomes in the uncomplicated term pregnancy

Soo Ran Choi

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine perinatal outcomes in uncomplicated term pregnancies with a borderline amniotic fluid index (AFI). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at term (>37 weeks). Borderline and normal AFI were defined as 5.1 ≤ AFI ≤ 8.0 cm and 8.1 ≤ AFI ≤ 24 cm, respectively. Adverse perinatal outcomes, cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, a 5-min Apgar score of <7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and whether the neonate was small for gestational age were compared between the borderline and normal AFI groups. RESULTS: Borderline AFI was not significantly associated with cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing (p = 0.513), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (p = 0.641), admission to the NICU (p = 0.368), or a 5-min Apgar score of <7 (p = 1.00). However, the number of neonates who were small for gestational age (p = 0.021) and rates of induction of labor (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the borderline group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that borderline AFI was not associated with cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-1.91, p = 0.52). CONCLUSION: In uncomplicated term pregnancies, a borderline AFI does not increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To determine perinatal outcomes in uncomplicated term pregnancies with a borderline amniotic fluid index (AFI). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at term (>37 weeks). Borderline and normal AFI were defined as 5.1 ≤ AFI ≤ 8.0 cm and 8.1 ≤ AFI ≤ 24 cm, respectively. Adverse perinatal outcomes, cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, a 5-min Apgar score of <7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and whether the neonate was small for gestational age were compared between the borderline and normal AFI groups. RESULTS: Borderline AFI was not significantly associated with cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing (p = 0.513), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (p = 0.641), admission to the NICU (p = 0.368), or a 5-min Apgar score of <7 (p = 1.00). However, the number of neonates who were small for gestational age (p = 0.021) and rates of induction of labor (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the borderline group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that borderline AFI was not associated with cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-1.91, p = 0.52). CONCLUSION: In uncomplicated term pregnancies, a borderline AFI does not increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine perinatal outcomes in uncomplicated term pregnancies with a borderline amniotic fluid index (AFI). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at term (>37 weeks). Borderline and normal AFI were defined as 5.1 ≤ AFI ≤ 8.0 cm and 8.1 ≤ AFI ≤ 24 cm, respectively. Adverse perinatal outcomes, cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, a 5-min Apgar score of <7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and whether the neonate was small for gestational age were compared between the borderline and normal AFI groups. RESULTS: Borderline AFI was not significantly associated with cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing (p = 0.513), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (p = 0.641), admission to the NICU (p = 0.368), or a 5-min Apgar score of <7 (p = 1.00). However, the number of neonates who were small for gestational age (p = 0.021) and rates of induction of labor (p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the borderline group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that borderline AFI was not associated with cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart rate testing (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-1.91, p = 0.52). CONCLUSION: In uncomplicated term pregnancies, a borderline AFI does not increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Key concepts: Medicine, Amniotic fluid index, Meconium, Obstetrics, Odds ratio, Gestational age, Amniotic fluid, Apgar score

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Borderline amniotic fluid index and perinatal outcomes in the uncomplicated term pregnancy — Research Paper | ScholarLens