1987International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and TechnologyRequires access

Understanding secondary mathematics: analysis of linguistic difficulties vis‐a‐vis errors

Santi Ghosh, Satyendranath Giri

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Misconceptions caused by misunderstanding mathematical language are of different types, e.g. interference of mathematical and non‐mathematical meanings, complexity or unfamiliarity of words, improper use of symbols, syntactical misunderstandings and redundancy or inadequacy of data. Fifteen mathematical words were presented to 84 students of 8th grade and the responses of students were analysed. Mathematical items of a Science Talent Search Test were also analysed from the answers of 100 candidates of 8th grade. The analysis casts light on the processes of the development of mathematical concepts which the students learn through the vicissitudes of the interaction of mathematical and non‐mathematical meanings of words which may be familiar or unfamiliar, relevant or irrelevant, and/or distinct or difficult, to the learners. Complications in understanding mathematical concepts for individual students are pointed out from these experiments. Acquaintance with such communication processes of learners can also help in detecting strategies of imparting mathematical instructions to the learners. Roles of the uses of common, mathematical, transformational, and story‐telling language have also been discussed. The paper concludes with some comments on the importance of guided discovery learning, error analysis by teachers, and the preparation of a register of mathematical language.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Misconceptions caused by misunderstanding mathematical language are of different types, e.g. interference of mathematical and non‐mathematical meanings, complexity or unfamiliarity of words, improper use of symbols, syntactical misunderstandings and redundancy or inadequacy of data. Fifteen mathematical words were presented to 84 students of 8th grade and the responses of students were analysed. Mathematical items of a Science Talent Search Test were also analysed from the answers of 100 candidates of 8th grade. The analysis casts light on the processes of the development of mathematical concepts which the students learn through the vicissitudes of the interaction of mathematical and non‐mathematical meanings of words which may be familiar or unfamiliar, relevant or irrelevant, and/or distinct or difficult, to the learners. Complications in understanding mathematical concepts for individual students are pointed out from these experiments. Acquaintance with such communication processes of learners can also help in detecting strategies of imparting mathematical instructions to the learners. Roles of the uses of common, mathematical, transformational, and story‐telling language have also been discussed. The paper concludes with some comments on the importance of guided discovery learning, error analysis by teachers, and the preparation of a register of mathematical language.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Misconceptions caused by misunderstanding mathematical language are of different types, e.g. interference of mathematical and non‐mathematical meanings, complexity or unfamiliarity of words, improper use of symbols, syntactical misunderstandings and redundancy or inadequacy of data. Fifteen mathematical words were presented to 84 students of 8th grade and the responses of students were analysed. Mathematical items of a Science Talent Search Test were also analysed from the answers of 100 candidates of 8th grade. The analysis casts light on the processes of the development of mathematical concepts which the students learn through the vicissitudes of the interaction of mathematical and non‐mathematical meanings of words which may be familiar or unfamiliar, relevant or irrelevant, and/or distinct or difficult, to the learners. Complications in understanding mathematical concepts for individual students are pointed out from these experiments. Acquaintance with such communication processes of learners can also help in detecting strategies of imparting mathematical instructions to the learners. Roles of the uses of common, mathematical, transformational, and story‐telling language have also been discussed. The paper concludes with some comments on the importance of guided discovery learning, error analysis by teachers, and the preparation of a register of mathematical language.

Key concepts: Language of mathematics, Mathematical problem, Mathematical structure, Mathematics education, Computer science, Mathematical theory, Linguistics, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Understanding secondary mathematics: analysis of linguistic difficulties vis‐a‐vis errors — Research Paper | ScholarLens