2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Scrum Anti-Patterns -- An Empirical Study

Veli-Pekka Eloranta, Kai Koskimies, Tommi Mikkonen, Jyri Vuorinen

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Wide-spread adoption of the agile movement has rapidly changed the landscape of software industry. In particular, Scrum is an agile process framework that has become extremely popular in industry. However, the practical implementation of Scrum in companies rarely follows the text book ideals. Typically, companies deviate from the proposed Scrum practices for different reasons. While some deviations may be well motivated and reasonable, companies are often tempted to adjust Scrum for the company without clearly understanding the consequences of the deviations. In this paper our aim is to identify ways of potentially harmful mishandling of Scrum in industry based on empirical data collected in a survey. The identified (mal)practices are presented in a semi-formal manner as anti-patterns. The study resulted in 10 anti-patterns that express the context of the deviation, the deviation itself, the broken core principles of Scrum, and the possible consequences of the deviation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wide-spread adoption of the agile movement has rapidly changed the landscape of software industry. In particular, Scrum is an agile process framework that has become extremely popular in industry. However, the practical implementation of Scrum in companies rarely follows the text book ideals. Typically, companies deviate from the proposed Scrum practices for different reasons. While some deviations may be well motivated and reasonable, companies are often tempted to adjust Scrum for the company without clearly understanding the consequences of the deviations. In this paper our aim is to identify ways of potentially harmful mishandling of Scrum in industry based on empirical data collected in a survey. The identified (mal)practices are presented in a semi-formal manner as anti-patterns. The study resulted in 10 anti-patterns that express the context of the deviation, the deviation itself, the broken core principles of Scrum, and the possible consequences of the deviation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wide-spread adoption of the agile movement has rapidly changed the landscape of software industry. In particular, Scrum is an agile process framework that has become extremely popular in industry. However, the practical implementation of Scrum in companies rarely follows the text book ideals. Typically, companies deviate from the proposed Scrum practices for different reasons. While some deviations may be well motivated and reasonable, companies are often tempted to adjust Scrum for the company without clearly understanding the consequences of the deviations. In this paper our aim is to identify ways of potentially harmful mishandling of Scrum in industry based on empirical data collected in a survey. The identified (mal)practices are presented in a semi-formal manner as anti-patterns. The study resulted in 10 anti-patterns that express the context of the deviation, the deviation itself, the broken core principles of Scrum, and the possible consequences of the deviation.

Key concepts: Scrum, Agile software development, Computer science, Context (archaeology), User story, Process (computing), Empirical research, Process management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Scrum Anti-Patterns -- An Empirical Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens