1977•The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)Open access

Magnetostratigraphy and Radiometric Chronology

Hiroshi Kitazato, Shirô Tamanyu

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper briefly reviews the history and present status of magnetostratigraphy, and re-examines the usefulness of magnetostratigraphy in absolute chronology. At present, two different kinds of time scale are used as standards for magnetostratigraphic age determination. The first is that time scale developed from a combination of paleomagnetic polarity data and radiometric age dates derived from volcanic rock sequences on land. The second is based on the interrelationships between the sequence of geomagnetic reversals and marine planktonic microfossils. Usually, these time scales are assumed to be equivalent.Based on the collection of radiometric dates made on magneto- and biostratigraphically-studied sedimentary sections, the relationships between the geomagnetic-radiometric and geomagnetic-microbiostratigraphic time scales were examined. A distinct discrepancy was noticed between the radiometric age and the estimated absolute age from the magnetic-microbiostratigraphic scale, as indicated in Fig. 5. This discrepancy is worthy of serious consideration by uses of the geomagnetic time scale in absolute chronology. Further examination of various methods of measurement is needed to increase the reliability of magnetostratigraphy, microbiostratigraphy and radiometric chronology.In Japanese marine sedimentary sections, there exist many pyroclastic intercalations that may provide suitable materials for such examinations.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper briefly reviews the history and present status of magnetostratigraphy, and re-examines the usefulness of magnetostratigraphy in absolute chronology. At present, two different kinds of time scale are used as standards for magnetostratigraphic age determination. The first is that time scale developed from a combination of paleomagnetic polarity data and radiometric age dates derived from volcanic rock sequences on land. The second is based on the interrelationships between the sequence of geomagnetic reversals and marine planktonic microfossils. Usually, these time scales are assumed to be equivalent.Based on the collection of radiometric dates made on magneto- and biostratigraphically-studied sedimentary sections, the relationships between the geomagnetic-radiometric and geomagnetic-microbiostratigraphic time scales were examined. A distinct discrepancy was noticed between the radiometric age and the estimated absolute age from the magnetic-microbiostratigraphic scale, as indicated in Fig. 5. This discrepancy is worthy of serious consideration by uses of the geomagnetic time scale in absolute chronology. Further examination of various methods of measurement is needed to increase the reliability of magnetostratigraphy, microbiostratigraphy and radiometric chronology.In Japanese marine sedimentary sections, there exist many pyroclastic intercalations that may provide suitable materials for such examinations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper briefly reviews the history and present status of magnetostratigraphy, and re-examines the usefulness of magnetostratigraphy in absolute chronology. At present, two different kinds of time scale are used as standards for magnetostratigraphic age determination. The first is that time scale developed from a combination of paleomagnetic polarity data and radiometric age dates derived from volcanic rock sequences on land. The second is based on the interrelationships between the sequence of geomagnetic reversals and marine planktonic microfossils. Usually, these time scales are assumed to be equivalent.Based on the collection of radiometric dates made on magneto- and biostratigraphically-studied sedimentary sections, the relationships between the geomagnetic-radiometric and geomagnetic-microbiostratigraphic time scales were examined. A distinct discrepancy was noticed between the radiometric age and the estimated absolute age from the magnetic-microbiostratigraphic scale, as indicated in Fig. 5. This discrepancy is worthy of serious consideration by uses of the geomagnetic time scale in absolute chronology. Further examination of various methods of measurement is needed to increase the reliability of magnetostratigraphy, microbiostratigraphy and radiometric chronology.In Japanese marine sedimentary sections, there exist many pyroclastic intercalations that may provide suitable materials for such examinations.

Key concepts: Magnetostratigraphy, Radiometric dating, Chronology, Earth's magnetic field, Geology, Paleomagnetism, Paleontology, Volcano

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Magnetostratigraphy and Radiometric Chronology — Research Paper | ScholarLens