2006Medical PhysicsRequires access

SU‐FF‐J‐17: Accuracy and Dosimetric Advantage of Target Localization Using Stereoscopic Image‐Guided Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Treatment

M Ding, K. Stuhr, F. Newman, T Johnson, Brian D. Kavanagh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: We analyzed the accuracy of stereoscopic image‐guided radiotherapy (S‐IGRT) with the ExacTrac® system (BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany), and demonstrated the dosimetric advantage for lung cancer treatment. Methods: The accuracy of target localization using the ExacTrac system was analyzed by re‐scanning ten patients immobilized in the Vac‐loc bag with BB tags put on the isocenter marks determined by the ExacTrac system. The re‐scanned CT data from each patient was fused and compared to the isocenter locations on the original CT used for the treatment planning. The Active Breathing Coordinator™ (Elekta, Norcross, GA) was employed to minimize the breathing motion effect on S‐IGRT. The dosimetric advantage of S‐IGRT was demonstrated by comparing the normal lung volume receiving 15%, 30% and 50% of the prescription dose (V15%, V30% and V50%) between the plans with smaller margins in the S‐IGRT and those with normal margins in the conventional radiotherapy for the ten patients. Results: The average isocenter shifts using S‐IGRT were within 3.4 ±1.7mm in the lateral, 3.6±1.9mm in the anterior/posterior, and 2.2±3.2mm in the superior/inferior directions. The added margins around the CTV to create the PTV were chosen to be 10mm in the superior/inferior and 5mm in radial direction for the lung cancer treatment planning in S‐IGRT. For the ten patients with CTV volume from 8.3cm3 to 43.4cm3 and lung volume from 2736cm3 to 3640cm3, the averages of V15%, V30% and V50% were 17.4%, 9.8%, 5.9% for the S‐IGRT plans, and 33.4%, 18.2%, 12.8% for the conventional radiotherapy plans with 2cm margins in the all directions. Conclusion: The S‐IGRT with the ExacTrac system provided highly accurate tumor localization. The margins from CTV to PTV in S‐IGRT treatment planning could be reduced significantly due to the accurate target localization which will reduce the lung volume receiving doses in the medium and low ranges.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: We analyzed the accuracy of stereoscopic image‐guided radiotherapy (S‐IGRT) with the ExacTrac® system (BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany), and demonstrated the dosimetric advantage for lung cancer treatment. Methods: The accuracy of target localization using the ExacTrac system was analyzed by re‐scanning ten patients immobilized in the Vac‐loc bag with BB tags put on the isocenter marks determined by the ExacTrac system. The re‐scanned CT data from each patient was fused and compared to the isocenter locations on the original CT used for the treatment planning. The Active Breathing Coordinator™ (Elekta, Norcross, GA) was employed to minimize the breathing motion effect on S‐IGRT. The dosimetric advantage of S‐IGRT was demonstrated by comparing the normal lung volume receiving 15%, 30% and 50% of the prescription dose (V15%, V30% and V50%) between the plans with smaller margins in the S‐IGRT and those with normal margins in the conventional radiotherapy for the ten patients. Results: The average isocenter shifts using S‐IGRT were within 3.4 ±1.7mm in the lateral, 3.6±1.9mm in the anterior/posterior, and 2.2±3.2mm in the superior/inferior directions. The added margins around the CTV to create the PTV were chosen to be 10mm in the superior/inferior and 5mm in radial direction for the lung cancer treatment planning in S‐IGRT. For the ten patients with CTV volume from 8.3cm3 to 43.4cm3 and lung volume from 2736cm3 to 3640cm3, the averages of V15%, V30% and V50% were 17.4%, 9.8%, 5.9% for the S‐IGRT plans, and 33.4%, 18.2%, 12.8% for the conventional radiotherapy plans with 2cm margins in the all directions. Conclusion: The S‐IGRT with the ExacTrac system provided highly accurate tumor localization. The margins from CTV to PTV in S‐IGRT treatment planning could be reduced significantly due to the accurate target localization which will reduce the lung volume receiving doses in the medium and low ranges.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: We analyzed the accuracy of stereoscopic image‐guided radiotherapy (S‐IGRT) with the ExacTrac® system (BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany), and demonstrated the dosimetric advantage for lung cancer treatment. Methods: The accuracy of target localization using the ExacTrac system was analyzed by re‐scanning ten patients immobilized in the Vac‐loc bag with BB tags put on the isocenter marks determined by the ExacTrac system. The re‐scanned CT data from each patient was fused and compared to the isocenter locations on the original CT used for the treatment planning. The Active Breathing Coordinator™ (Elekta, Norcross, GA) was employed to minimize the breathing motion effect on S‐IGRT. The dosimetric advantage of S‐IGRT was demonstrated by comparing the normal lung volume receiving 15%, 30% and 50% of the prescription dose (V15%, V30% and V50%) between the plans with smaller margins in the S‐IGRT and those with normal margins in the conventional radiotherapy for the ten patients. Results: The average isocenter shifts using S‐IGRT were within 3.4 ±1.7mm in the lateral, 3.6±1.9mm in the anterior/posterior, and 2.2±3.2mm in the superior/inferior directions. The added margins around the CTV to create the PTV were chosen to be 10mm in the superior/inferior and 5mm in radial direction for the lung cancer treatment planning in S‐IGRT. For the ten patients with CTV volume from 8.3cm3 to 43.4cm3 and lung volume from 2736cm3 to 3640cm3, the averages of V15%, V30% and V50% were 17.4%, 9.8%, 5.9% for the S‐IGRT plans, and 33.4%, 18.2%, 12.8% for the conventional radiotherapy plans with 2cm margins in the all directions. Conclusion: The S‐IGRT with the ExacTrac system provided highly accurate tumor localization. The margins from CTV to PTV in S‐IGRT treatment planning could be reduced significantly due to the accurate target localization which will reduce the lung volume receiving doses in the medium and low ranges.

Key concepts: Isocenter, Image-guided radiation therapy, Medicine, Radiation therapy, Nuclear medicine, Lung cancer, Radiation treatment planning, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SU‐FF‐J‐17: Accuracy and Dosimetric Advantage of Target Localization Using Stereoscopic Image‐Guided Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens