2003Journal of PhytopathologyRequires access

Protective, Curative and Eradicant Activity of the Strobilurin Fungicide Azoxystrobin against Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae

T. Anesiadis, G. S. Karaoglanidis, K. Tzavella‐Klonari

Open publisher page 49 citations

Abstract

Abstract The protective, curative and eradicant activity of the strobilurin fungicide azoxystrobin against Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae on sugar beet was determined under growth chamber conditions. Difenoconazole and chlorothalonil were used as standard fungicides against C. beticola, while chlorothalonil was replaced by sulphur against E. betae. Fungicides were applied before (protective treatments) and after (curative treatments) inoculation at 24, 48 and 96 h intervals, respectively. An additional spray treatment was applied after the appearance of the symptoms to evaluate the eradicant activity of the fungicides tested. Applications of azoxystrobin at 16 μ/ml provided 89–94% and 95–97% disease control against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Curative treatments of azoxystrobin either at 8 or 16 μg/ml provided control of Cercospora leaf‐spot higher than 90% only when it was applied 24 h after inoculation of the plants. Comparatively, chlorothalonil (100 μg/ml) provided satisfactory control of C. beticola when applied in protective treatments (83–87% disease control) but showed little activity when applied after the inoculation of the seedlings (45–76% disease control). High control efficacy against E. betae was also obtained by protective applications of sulphur (600 μg/ml) but the fungicide failed to provide satisfactory disease control, particularly when applied for 48 or 96 h after inoculation of seedlings. Difenoconazole (8 μg/ml) gave excellent protective and curative activity against both pathogens. Eradicative treatments with azoxystrobin provided high antisporulant activity of 94–96% and 85–93% against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Similarly, high antisporulant activity was also provided by difenoconazole, while postsymptom applications of chlorothalonil and sulphur provided significantly lower antisporulant activity against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Such results encourage the evaluation of azoxystrobin under field conditions to determine optimal treatment schedules and to select possibly partner fungicides for use in mixtures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The protective, curative and eradicant activity of the strobilurin fungicide azoxystrobin against Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae on sugar beet was determined under growth chamber conditions. Difenoconazole and chlorothalonil were used as standard fungicides against C. beticola, while chlorothalonil was replaced by sulphur against E. betae. Fungicides were applied before (protective treatments) and after (curative treatments) inoculation at 24, 48 and 96 h intervals, respectively. An additional spray treatment was applied after the appearance of the symptoms to evaluate the eradicant activity of the fungicides tested. Applications of azoxystrobin at 16 μ/ml provided 89–94% and 95–97% disease control against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Curative treatments of azoxystrobin either at 8 or 16 μg/ml provided control of Cercospora leaf‐spot higher than 90% only when it was applied 24 h after inoculation of the plants. Comparatively, chlorothalonil (100 μg/ml) provided satisfactory control of C. beticola when applied in protective treatments (83–87% disease control) but showed little activity when applied after the inoculation of the seedlings (45–76% disease control). High control efficacy against E. betae was also obtained by protective applications of sulphur (600 μg/ml) but the fungicide failed to provide satisfactory disease control, particularly when applied for 48 or 96 h after inoculation of seedlings. Difenoconazole (8 μg/ml) gave excellent protective and curative activity against both pathogens. Eradicative treatments with azoxystrobin provided high antisporulant activity of 94–96% and 85–93% against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Similarly, high antisporulant activity was also provided by difenoconazole, while postsymptom applications of chlorothalonil and sulphur provided significantly lower antisporulant activity against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Such results encourage the evaluation of azoxystrobin under field conditions to determine optimal treatment schedules and to select possibly partner fungicides for use in mixtures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The protective, curative and eradicant activity of the strobilurin fungicide azoxystrobin against Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae on sugar beet was determined under growth chamber conditions. Difenoconazole and chlorothalonil were used as standard fungicides against C. beticola, while chlorothalonil was replaced by sulphur against E. betae. Fungicides were applied before (protective treatments) and after (curative treatments) inoculation at 24, 48 and 96 h intervals, respectively. An additional spray treatment was applied after the appearance of the symptoms to evaluate the eradicant activity of the fungicides tested. Applications of azoxystrobin at 16 μ/ml provided 89–94% and 95–97% disease control against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Curative treatments of azoxystrobin either at 8 or 16 μg/ml provided control of Cercospora leaf‐spot higher than 90% only when it was applied 24 h after inoculation of the plants. Comparatively, chlorothalonil (100 μg/ml) provided satisfactory control of C. beticola when applied in protective treatments (83–87% disease control) but showed little activity when applied after the inoculation of the seedlings (45–76% disease control). High control efficacy against E. betae was also obtained by protective applications of sulphur (600 μg/ml) but the fungicide failed to provide satisfactory disease control, particularly when applied for 48 or 96 h after inoculation of seedlings. Difenoconazole (8 μg/ml) gave excellent protective and curative activity against both pathogens. Eradicative treatments with azoxystrobin provided high antisporulant activity of 94–96% and 85–93% against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Similarly, high antisporulant activity was also provided by difenoconazole, while postsymptom applications of chlorothalonil and sulphur provided significantly lower antisporulant activity against C. beticola and E. betae, respectively. Such results encourage the evaluation of azoxystrobin under field conditions to determine optimal treatment schedules and to select possibly partner fungicides for use in mixtures.

Key concepts: Azoxystrobin, Fungicide, Strobilurin, Chlorothalonil, Biology, Horticulture, Sugar beet, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Protective, Curative and Eradicant Activity of the Strobilurin Fungicide Azoxystrobin against Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae — Research Paper | ScholarLens