2005Journal of Political IdeologiesRequires access

Socialism and libertarianism

Peter McLaverty

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

In this article, I attempt to define the concepts of socialism and libertarianism. While recognising that the meaning of socialism has developed over time and is not set in stone, and after outlining the ways in which a number of writers have defined socialism, I argue that key socialist values are incompatible with libertarianism, the core feature of which, I argue, is a commitment to the principle of self-ownership. Libertarianism, I contend, involves a denial of what are widely seen as core socialist ideas (that we are social beings, that society should be organised, and individuals should act, so as to promote the common good, that we should strive to achieve social equality and promote democracy, community and solidarity) even though some writers regard libertarianism as a socialist principle or value. I conclude that socialists should not be libertarians, for there is an acute tension between socialism and libertarianism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, I attempt to define the concepts of socialism and libertarianism. While recognising that the meaning of socialism has developed over time and is not set in stone, and after outlining the ways in which a number of writers have defined socialism, I argue that key socialist values are incompatible with libertarianism, the core feature of which, I argue, is a commitment to the principle of self-ownership. Libertarianism, I contend, involves a denial of what are widely seen as core socialist ideas (that we are social beings, that society should be organised, and individuals should act, so as to promote the common good, that we should strive to achieve social equality and promote democracy, community and solidarity) even though some writers regard libertarianism as a socialist principle or value. I conclude that socialists should not be libertarians, for there is an acute tension between socialism and libertarianism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, I attempt to define the concepts of socialism and libertarianism. While recognising that the meaning of socialism has developed over time and is not set in stone, and after outlining the ways in which a number of writers have defined socialism, I argue that key socialist values are incompatible with libertarianism, the core feature of which, I argue, is a commitment to the principle of self-ownership. Libertarianism, I contend, involves a denial of what are widely seen as core socialist ideas (that we are social beings, that society should be organised, and individuals should act, so as to promote the common good, that we should strive to achieve social equality and promote democracy, community and solidarity) even though some writers regard libertarianism as a socialist principle or value. I conclude that socialists should not be libertarians, for there is an acute tension between socialism and libertarianism.

Key concepts: Libertarianism, Socialism, Sociology, Solidarity, Ideology, Value (mathematics), Democracy, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Socialism and libertarianism — Research Paper | ScholarLens