Levels of Evaluation
Valorie Beer, Anne C. Bloomer
Abstract
Valorie Beer, Anne C. Bloomer
Abstract
The formative-summative paradigm is useful in that it draws attention to the importance of process and outcome measures in evaluation. The paradigm is not helpful in practical evaluation planning, however, because it unnecessarily separates qualitative and quantitative methods, and because it does not differentiate among various types of formative evaluation. The article presents a strategy for organizing the evaluation effort into three levels. Each level combines aspects of formative and summative evaluations and includes a variety of methods for addressing the evaluation questions. Resources and skills needed by evaluators at each level are recommended, and a plan for implementing the strategy is suggested.
OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The formative-summative paradigm is useful in that it draws attention to the importance of process and outcome measures in evaluation. The paradigm is not helpful in practical evaluation planning, however, because it unnecessarily separates qualitative and quantitative methods, and because it does not differentiate among various types of formative evaluation. The article presents a strategy for organizing the evaluation effort into three levels. Each level combines aspects of formative and summative evaluations and includes a variety of methods for addressing the evaluation questions. Resources and skills needed by evaluators at each level are recommended, and a plan for implementing the strategy is suggested.
Key concepts: Summative assessment, Formative assessment, Evaluation methods, Variety (cybernetics), Process (computing), Knowledge survey, Computer science, Outcome (game theory)