Dynamic Linear Back Calculation of Pavement Material Parameters
Jacob Uzan
Abstract
Jacob Uzan
Abstract
The dynamic linear back calculation procedure for estimating pavement material properties is presented. Two approaches based on the fitting of the data in the time and frequency domain are described in detail. The time‐domain approach is recommended when the deflection histories do not decay to zero at the end of the sampling window. The parameter identification procedure used to generate the sensitivity matrix and the load vector and to solve the overdetermined set of equations is described. Twenty‐four test sections from the GPS of the SHRP‐LTPP program are analyzed. The material properties back calculated are: (1) The moduli of elasticity for unbound base, subbase and subgrade materials; and (2) the parameters of the generalized power law of the creep compliance of the asphalt concrete. The results are compared with those of the static linear back‐calculation procedure and of laboratory tests. It is found that: (1) The moduli of elasticity for unbound materials from static and dynamic analyses compare relatively well; and (2) the exponents of the power law from back calculation and laboratory results do not compare well. It is suggested that the sample tested in the laboratory may not be representative of the whole asphalt concrete layer.
OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The dynamic linear back calculation procedure for estimating pavement material properties is presented. Two approaches based on the fitting of the data in the time and frequency domain are described in detail. The time‐domain approach is recommended when the deflection histories do not decay to zero at the end of the sampling window. The parameter identification procedure used to generate the sensitivity matrix and the load vector and to solve the overdetermined set of equations is described. Twenty‐four test sections from the GPS of the SHRP‐LTPP program are analyzed. The material properties back calculated are: (1) The moduli of elasticity for unbound base, subbase and subgrade materials; and (2) the parameters of the generalized power law of the creep compliance of the asphalt concrete. The results are compared with those of the static linear back‐calculation procedure and of laboratory tests. It is found that: (1) The moduli of elasticity for unbound materials from static and dynamic analyses compare relatively well; and (2) the exponents of the power law from back calculation and laboratory results do not compare well. It is suggested that the sample tested in the laboratory may not be representative of the whole asphalt concrete layer.
Key concepts: Overdetermined system, Subgrade, Moduli, Time domain, Asphalt concrete, Structural engineering, Subbase, Deflection (physics)