Temporally‐resolved inkjet drop impaction on surfaces
Hongming Dong, Wallace W. Carr, David G. Bucknall, Jeffrey F. Morris
Abstract
Hongming Dong, Wallace W. Carr, David G. Bucknall, Jeffrey F. Morris
Abstract
Abstract Impaction on smooth solid substrates of drops formed by the drop‐on‐demand (DOD) method was investigated over a wide range of impaction speeds (U0 = 2.21–12.2 m/s), surface contact angles (θ = 6–107°), and drop diameters (D0 = 40.8–50.5 μm). The experimental results were compared with several existing equations for predicting maximum spreading. The dimensionless time to reach maximum spreading ratio, scaled by D0/U0, ranged from 0.6 to 2.99, depending on Weber number and contact angle. Micron and millimeter drop impactions were compared, and the results indicate that scaling based on three dimensionless numbers (We, Re or Oh, and cos θ) is valid, but spreading ratios of millimeter drops are usually slightly larger during the whole process. The difference is ascribed mainly to the effect of gravity. © 2007 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2007
OpenAlex reports 118 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Impaction on smooth solid substrates of drops formed by the drop‐on‐demand (DOD) method was investigated over a wide range of impaction speeds (U0 = 2.21–12.2 m/s), surface contact angles (θ = 6–107°), and drop diameters (D0 = 40.8–50.5 μm). The experimental results were compared with several existing equations for predicting maximum spreading. The dimensionless time to reach maximum spreading ratio, scaled by D0/U0, ranged from 0.6 to 2.99, depending on Weber number and contact angle. Micron and millimeter drop impactions were compared, and the results indicate that scaling based on three dimensionless numbers (We, Re or Oh, and cos θ) is valid, but spreading ratios of millimeter drops are usually slightly larger during the whole process. The difference is ascribed mainly to the effect of gravity. © 2007 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2007
Key concepts: Dimensionless quantity, Drop (telecommunication), Impaction, Scaling, Millimeter, Drop impact, Contact angle, Mechanics