2012The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical SciencesOpen access

Expression of MMP‐2, MMP‐9 and MMP‐11 in dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

Yi‐Ting Chen, Wan‐Tzu Chen, Wan‐Ting Huang, Chun‐Chieh Wu, Chee‐Yin Chai

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

Dermatofibroma (DF) and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) are the spindle cell mesenchymal neoplasms of the dermis and subcutis. Their histogenesis still remains uncertain and controversial. Traditionally, CD34 and factor XIIIa or other markers have been widely used to distinguish these two diseases. However, the results of these markers reveal overlapping and they lack specificity. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks were collected from the biopsied cases in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in Taiwan between 2004 and 2006. This study included 19 cases of DF and 17 cases of DFSP. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies CD34, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and MMP-11 was performed. We found that the expression of CD34, MMP-2 and MMP-11 shows significant statistical differences in Immunohistochemistry (IHC) study positive or negative reactivity (positive of CD34 in DFSP and positive of MMP-2 and MMP-11 in DF; p=0.03, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively) between DF and DFSP. The result for expression of MMP-9 reveals no differences. The results indicate that the pathogenesis of DF and DFSP are affected by different expressions of extracellular matrix proteins. Metalloproteinases may play a direct role in these two diseases. Since no single marker can completely distinguish DF from DFSP, a combination of more than two or three stains may elevate the accuracy of diagnosis.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Dermatofibroma (DF) and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) are the spindle cell mesenchymal neoplasms of the dermis and subcutis. Their histogenesis still remains uncertain and controversial. Traditionally, CD34 and factor XIIIa or other markers have been widely used to distinguish these two diseases. However, the results of these markers reveal overlapping and they lack specificity. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks were collected from the biopsied cases in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in Taiwan between 2004 and 2006. This study included 19 cases of DF and 17 cases of DFSP. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies CD34, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and MMP-11 was performed. We found that the expression of CD34, MMP-2 and MMP-11 shows significant statistical differences in Immunohistochemistry (IHC) study positive or negative reactivity (positive of CD34 in DFSP and positive of MMP-2 and MMP-11 in DF; p=0.03, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively) between DF and DFSP. The result for expression of MMP-9 reveals no differences. The results indicate that the pathogenesis of DF and DFSP are affected by different expressions of extracellular matrix proteins. Metalloproteinases may play a direct role in these two diseases. Since no single marker can completely distinguish DF from DFSP, a combination of more than two or three stains may elevate the accuracy of diagnosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Dermatofibroma (DF) and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) are the spindle cell mesenchymal neoplasms of the dermis and subcutis. Their histogenesis still remains uncertain and controversial. Traditionally, CD34 and factor XIIIa or other markers have been widely used to distinguish these two diseases. However, the results of these markers reveal overlapping and they lack specificity. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks were collected from the biopsied cases in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital in Taiwan between 2004 and 2006. This study included 19 cases of DF and 17 cases of DFSP. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies CD34, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and MMP-11 was performed. We found that the expression of CD34, MMP-2 and MMP-11 shows significant statistical differences in Immunohistochemistry (IHC) study positive or negative reactivity (positive of CD34 in DFSP and positive of MMP-2 and MMP-11 in DF; p=0.03, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively) between DF and DFSP. The result for expression of MMP-9 reveals no differences. The results indicate that the pathogenesis of DF and DFSP are affected by different expressions of extracellular matrix proteins. Metalloproteinases may play a direct role in these two diseases. Since no single marker can completely distinguish DF from DFSP, a combination of more than two or three stains may elevate the accuracy of diagnosis.

Key concepts: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, CD34, Dermatofibroma, Histogenesis, Immunohistochemistry, Medicine, Pathology, Matrix metalloproteinase

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Expression of MMP‐2, MMP‐9 and MMP‐11 in dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans — Research Paper | ScholarLens