2003Science EducationRequires access

Challenges of standards‐based reform: The example of California's science content standards and textbook adoption process

Julie A. Bianchini, Gregory J. Kelly

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we debate the strengths and limitations of standards‐based science education reform in the United States. Our purpose is to raise questions and encourage conversations about the mis/uses of standards to shape science curriculum and instructional practices at both state and national levels. We begin by examining the case of California: California recently developed science content standards and used these standards to guide the development, assessment, and adoption of K‐8 science instructional materials, a process in which we participated. We offer substantive critique of the California standards themselves and the ways such standards narrowly frame science education for the state's teachers and students. We then move to more general challenges posed by fashioning standards as instruments of reform: the proliferation of increasingly unwieldy instructional materials and the muting of teachers' voices in local decision‐making processes. While we do not call for the elimination of standards, we argue for greater awareness of the challenges in using standards to achieve science education reform and for renewed effort to include teachers in the translation of standards into local, responsive practice. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 87:378–389, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10064

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In this paper, we debate the strengths and limitations of standards‐based science education reform in the United States. Our purpose is to raise questions and encourage conversations about the mis/uses of standards to shape science curriculum and instructional practices at both state and national levels. We begin by examining the case of California: California recently developed science content standards and used these standards to guide the development, assessment, and adoption of K‐8 science instructional materials, a process in which we participated. We offer substantive critique of the California standards themselves and the ways such standards narrowly frame science education for the state's teachers and students. We then move to more general challenges posed by fashioning standards as instruments of reform: the proliferation of increasingly unwieldy instructional materials and the muting of teachers' voices in local decision‐making processes. While we do not call for the elimination of standards, we argue for greater awareness of the challenges in using standards to achieve science education reform and for renewed effort to include teachers in the translation of standards into local, responsive practice. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 87:378–389, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10064

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In this paper, we debate the strengths and limitations of standards‐based science education reform in the United States. Our purpose is to raise questions and encourage conversations about the mis/uses of standards to shape science curriculum and instructional practices at both state and national levels. We begin by examining the case of California: California recently developed science content standards and used these standards to guide the development, assessment, and adoption of K‐8 science instructional materials, a process in which we participated. We offer substantive critique of the California standards themselves and the ways such standards narrowly frame science education for the state's teachers and students. We then move to more general challenges posed by fashioning standards as instruments of reform: the proliferation of increasingly unwieldy instructional materials and the muting of teachers' voices in local decision‐making processes. While we do not call for the elimination of standards, we argue for greater awareness of the challenges in using standards to achieve science education reform and for renewed effort to include teachers in the translation of standards into local, responsive practice. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 87:378–389, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10064

Key concepts: Learning standards, National Science Education Standards, Science education, Curriculum, Academic standards, Next Generation Science Standards, Process (computing), State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Challenges of standards‐based reform: The example of California's science content standards and textbook adoption process — Research Paper | ScholarLens