2003SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesOpen access

A Comparison of On-Track and Wind Tunnel Surface Pressure Measurements on a Compact SUV

Andrew A. Lawson, R. G. Dominy, Andrew Sheppard

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

Aerodynamic evaluation of passenger vehicles has been almost exclusively performed in the controlled, low turbulence environment provided in wind tunnels. Such conditions are rarely encountered on the road where the local atmospheric wind conditions give rise to velocity fluctuations and changes in turbulence characteristics. A preliminary study has been undertaken in an attempt to identify differences in surface static pressures measured during wind tunnel and on-track tests. Significant differences in the data from wind tunnel and track tests have been identified and discussed, justifying the need for further in-depth examination of the differences between wind tunnel and on-road testing. The use of surface static pressure tappings mounted around the nose of the vehicle, for use as a macro probe, has been conducted. Encouraging results were produced prompting further development of this technique.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aerodynamic evaluation of passenger vehicles has been almost exclusively performed in the controlled, low turbulence environment provided in wind tunnels. Such conditions are rarely encountered on the road where the local atmospheric wind conditions give rise to velocity fluctuations and changes in turbulence characteristics. A preliminary study has been undertaken in an attempt to identify differences in surface static pressures measured during wind tunnel and on-track tests. Significant differences in the data from wind tunnel and track tests have been identified and discussed, justifying the need for further in-depth examination of the differences between wind tunnel and on-road testing. The use of surface static pressure tappings mounted around the nose of the vehicle, for use as a macro probe, has been conducted. Encouraging results were produced prompting further development of this technique.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aerodynamic evaluation of passenger vehicles has been almost exclusively performed in the controlled, low turbulence environment provided in wind tunnels. Such conditions are rarely encountered on the road where the local atmospheric wind conditions give rise to velocity fluctuations and changes in turbulence characteristics. A preliminary study has been undertaken in an attempt to identify differences in surface static pressures measured during wind tunnel and on-track tests. Significant differences in the data from wind tunnel and track tests have been identified and discussed, justifying the need for further in-depth examination of the differences between wind tunnel and on-road testing. The use of surface static pressure tappings mounted around the nose of the vehicle, for use as a macro probe, has been conducted. Encouraging results were produced prompting further development of this technique.

Key concepts: Wind tunnel, Track (disk drive), Meteorology, Environmental science, Surface pressure, Remote sensing, Marine engineering, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of On-Track and Wind Tunnel Surface Pressure Measurements on a Compact SUV — Research Paper | ScholarLens