1994Military PsychologyRequires access

Improving the Measurement of Team Performance: The TARGETs Methodology

Jennifer Fowlkes, Norman E. Lane, Eduardo Salas, Thomas R. Franz, Randall L. Oser

Open publisher page 162 citations

Abstract

This article describes a study evaluating a team performance measurement methodology that has application to the military. The development of the methodology was driven by team performance measurement requirements that encompassed theoretical, psychometric, and operational issues. It is a form of structured observation in which (a) task events are introduced to provide opportunities for teams to demonstrate specific team-related behaviors; (b) acceptable team responses to each of the events are determined a priori by utilizing team task analyses, subject-matter experts, and so forth; and (c) the appropriate responses to events are scored as either present or absent. The strength of this approach is that it is operationally relevant, minimizes judg- ments required by observer scorers, and permits controlled observation of teams across a variety of specific team behaviors. In the application described in this article, reliable and sensitive performance scores were obtained from six military aircrews. The implications of the results for the measurement of team performance are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article describes a study evaluating a team performance measurement methodology that has application to the military. The development of the methodology was driven by team performance measurement requirements that encompassed theoretical, psychometric, and operational issues. It is a form of structured observation in which (a) task events are introduced to provide opportunities for teams to demonstrate specific team-related behaviors; (b) acceptable team responses to each of the events are determined a priori by utilizing team task analyses, subject-matter experts, and so forth; and (c) the appropriate responses to events are scored as either present or absent. The strength of this approach is that it is operationally relevant, minimizes judg- ments required by observer scorers, and permits controlled observation of teams across a variety of specific team behaviors. In the application described in this article, reliable and sensitive performance scores were obtained from six military aircrews. The implications of the results for the measurement of team performance are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 162 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article describes a study evaluating a team performance measurement methodology that has application to the military. The development of the methodology was driven by team performance measurement requirements that encompassed theoretical, psychometric, and operational issues. It is a form of structured observation in which (a) task events are introduced to provide opportunities for teams to demonstrate specific team-related behaviors; (b) acceptable team responses to each of the events are determined a priori by utilizing team task analyses, subject-matter experts, and so forth; and (c) the appropriate responses to events are scored as either present or absent. The strength of this approach is that it is operationally relevant, minimizes judg- ments required by observer scorers, and permits controlled observation of teams across a variety of specific team behaviors. In the application described in this article, reliable and sensitive performance scores were obtained from six military aircrews. The implications of the results for the measurement of team performance are discussed.

Key concepts: Task (project management), Variety (cybernetics), Computer science, Performance measurement, Team composition, Team effectiveness, Psychology, Process management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improving the Measurement of Team Performance: The TARGETs Methodology — Research Paper | ScholarLens