2002•African Sociological Review / Revue Africaine de SociologieOpen access

Monopoly Politikos : How Botswana's opposition Parties have helped sustain One-Party Dominance

Onalenna Selolwane

Open full text 30 citations

Abstract

The main thesis of this paper is that Botswana 's opposition parties are accountable for their failure to provide the voting public with a meaning­ ful alternative to the ruling Botswana Democratic Party. While conced­ ing the explanatory importance of other factors such as resource capacity, this paper departs from conventional wisdom by focusing on the strategic and ideological weaknesses of the opposition parties. It argues that the opposition parties made a number of strategic errors which ren­ dered them electorally unattractive before they could establish their legitimacy as contenders for government power. To break the monopoly of power that the ruling party has so far enjoyed, Botswana 's opposition must transform itself into a meaningful competitor and govern­ ment-in-waiting. To do that they must (a) demonstrate that they have a viable, alternative economic management strategy to better satisfy the interests of a diverse voting public and (b) develop broad based political strategies targeting the diverse voting public to build voter confidence in the capability of the party as a possible government. The ruling party's track record of four decades of sustained economic growth leaves a for­ midable challenge to the opposition.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The main thesis of this paper is that Botswana 's opposition parties are accountable for their failure to provide the voting public with a meaning­ ful alternative to the ruling Botswana Democratic Party. While conced­ ing the explanatory importance of other factors such as resource capacity, this paper departs from conventional wisdom by focusing on the strategic and ideological weaknesses of the opposition parties. It argues that the opposition parties made a number of strategic errors which ren­ dered them electorally unattractive before they could establish their legitimacy as contenders for government power. To break the monopoly of power that the ruling party has so far enjoyed, Botswana 's opposition must transform itself into a meaningful competitor and govern­ ment-in-waiting. To do that they must (a) demonstrate that they have a viable, alternative economic management strategy to better satisfy the interests of a diverse voting public and (b) develop broad based political strategies targeting the diverse voting public to build voter confidence in the capability of the party as a possible government. The ruling party's track record of four decades of sustained economic growth leaves a for­ midable challenge to the opposition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The main thesis of this paper is that Botswana 's opposition parties are accountable for their failure to provide the voting public with a meaning­ ful alternative to the ruling Botswana Democratic Party. While conced­ ing the explanatory importance of other factors such as resource capacity, this paper departs from conventional wisdom by focusing on the strategic and ideological weaknesses of the opposition parties. It argues that the opposition parties made a number of strategic errors which ren­ dered them electorally unattractive before they could establish their legitimacy as contenders for government power. To break the monopoly of power that the ruling party has so far enjoyed, Botswana 's opposition must transform itself into a meaningful competitor and govern­ ment-in-waiting. To do that they must (a) demonstrate that they have a viable, alternative economic management strategy to better satisfy the interests of a diverse voting public and (b) develop broad based political strategies targeting the diverse voting public to build voter confidence in the capability of the party as a possible government. The ruling party's track record of four decades of sustained economic growth leaves a for­ midable challenge to the opposition.

Key concepts: Opposition (politics), Voting, Political economy, Politics, Monopoly, Legitimacy, Democracy, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monopoly Politikos : How Botswana's opposition Parties have helped sustain One-Party Dominance — Research Paper | ScholarLens