1991•European Journal Of HaematologyRequires access

Cardiotoxicity of epirubicin and doxorubicin: A double‐blind randomized study

Reino Lahtinen, Jyrki T. Kuikka, T. Nousiainen, Matti I.J. Uusitupa, Esko Länsimies

Open publisher page 72 citations

Abstract

24 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized into two multidrug regimens including either epirubicin (N = 12) or doxorubicin (N = 12) to establish the cardiotoxicity of each treatment modality. At cumulative doses of 400-500 mg/m2 left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest determined by radionuclide angiocardiography decreased significantly more in the doxorubicin (-15 +/- 11%) than in the epirubicin group (0 +/- 13%, p less than 0.005). During epirubicin therapy no clinically significant cardiotoxicity developed, but a decrease larger than 10% in LVEF was seen in 4 of 12 patients at a mean cumulative level of 450 mg/m2. During doxorubicin therapy 1 patient developed a heart failure at a cumulative level of 200 mg/m2 and, altogether, in 7 patients LVEF decreased more than 10%. The monitoring of cardiac toxicity is imperative in patients treated with doxorubicin and is advisable if the patient is expected to receive epirubicin at more than 450 mg/m2.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

24 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized into two multidrug regimens including either epirubicin (N = 12) or doxorubicin (N = 12) to establish the cardiotoxicity of each treatment modality. At cumulative doses of 400-500 mg/m2 left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest determined by radionuclide angiocardiography decreased significantly more in the doxorubicin (-15 +/- 11%) than in the epirubicin group (0 +/- 13%, p less than 0.005). During epirubicin therapy no clinically significant cardiotoxicity developed, but a decrease larger than 10% in LVEF was seen in 4 of 12 patients at a mean cumulative level of 450 mg/m2. During doxorubicin therapy 1 patient developed a heart failure at a cumulative level of 200 mg/m2 and, altogether, in 7 patients LVEF decreased more than 10%. The monitoring of cardiac toxicity is imperative in patients treated with doxorubicin and is advisable if the patient is expected to receive epirubicin at more than 450 mg/m2.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 72 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

24 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized into two multidrug regimens including either epirubicin (N = 12) or doxorubicin (N = 12) to establish the cardiotoxicity of each treatment modality. At cumulative doses of 400-500 mg/m2 left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest determined by radionuclide angiocardiography decreased significantly more in the doxorubicin (-15 +/- 11%) than in the epirubicin group (0 +/- 13%, p less than 0.005). During epirubicin therapy no clinically significant cardiotoxicity developed, but a decrease larger than 10% in LVEF was seen in 4 of 12 patients at a mean cumulative level of 450 mg/m2. During doxorubicin therapy 1 patient developed a heart failure at a cumulative level of 200 mg/m2 and, altogether, in 7 patients LVEF decreased more than 10%. The monitoring of cardiac toxicity is imperative in patients treated with doxorubicin and is advisable if the patient is expected to receive epirubicin at more than 450 mg/m2.

Key concepts: Epirubicin, Cardiotoxicity, Ejection fraction, Medicine, Doxorubicin, Cumulative dose, Anthracycline, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cardiotoxicity of epirubicin and doxorubicin: A double‐blind randomized study — Research Paper | ScholarLens