1970Society of Petroleum Engineers JournalRequires access

Representation of Reservoir Geometry for Numerical Simulation

George J. Hirasaki, P. M. O’Dell

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

Abstract For most reservoirs the reservoir thickness and dip vary with position. For such reservoirs, the use of a Cartesian coordinate system is awkward as the coordinate surfaces are planes and the finite-difference grid elements are rectangular parallepipeds. However, these reservoirs may be efficiently parallepipeds. However, these reservoirs may be efficiently modeled with a curvilinear coordinate system that has coordinate surfaces that coincide with the reservoir surfaces. A procedure is presented that may be used to determine a curvilinear coordinate system that will conform with the geometry of the reservoir. The reservoir geometry is described by the depth of the top of the reservoir and the thickness. The mass conservation equations are presented in curvilinear coordinates. The finite-difference equations differ from the usual Cartesian coordinate formulation by a factor multiplying the pore volume and transmissibilities. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the magnitude of the error that may occur in the computed oil recovery if the Cartesian coordinate system is simply modified to yield the correct depth and pore volumes. Introduction Many reservoirs have a shape that is inconvenient and possibly inaccurate to model with Cartesian coordinates. The use of a curvilinear coordinate system that follows the shape of the reservoir can be advantageous for such reservoirs. The formulation discussed here will have the greatest advantage in modeling thin reservoirs but will have little advantage in modeling a reservoir whose thickness is greater than its radius of curvature, such as a pinnacle reef. pinnacle reef. In this paper the reader is introduced to various grid systems used to model reservoirs. A brief discussion of some concepts of differential geometry contrasts differences between Cartesian coordinates and curvilinear coordinates. A curvilinear coordinate system for modeling reservoir geometry is presented. Formulation of the conservation equations in curvilinear coordinates and the necessary modifications to pore volume and transmissibility are discussed. A numerical example illustrates the magnitude of the error that may result from some coordinate systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract For most reservoirs the reservoir thickness and dip vary with position. For such reservoirs, the use of a Cartesian coordinate system is awkward as the coordinate surfaces are planes and the finite-difference grid elements are rectangular parallepipeds. However, these reservoirs may be efficiently parallepipeds. However, these reservoirs may be efficiently modeled with a curvilinear coordinate system that has coordinate surfaces that coincide with the reservoir surfaces. A procedure is presented that may be used to determine a curvilinear coordinate system that will conform with the geometry of the reservoir. The reservoir geometry is described by the depth of the top of the reservoir and the thickness. The mass conservation equations are presented in curvilinear coordinates. The finite-difference equations differ from the usual Cartesian coordinate formulation by a factor multiplying the pore volume and transmissibilities. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the magnitude of the error that may occur in the computed oil recovery if the Cartesian coordinate system is simply modified to yield the correct depth and pore volumes. Introduction Many reservoirs have a shape that is inconvenient and possibly inaccurate to model with Cartesian coordinates. The use of a curvilinear coordinate system that follows the shape of the reservoir can be advantageous for such reservoirs. The formulation discussed here will have the greatest advantage in modeling thin reservoirs but will have little advantage in modeling a reservoir whose thickness is greater than its radius of curvature, such as a pinnacle reef. pinnacle reef. In this paper the reader is introduced to various grid systems used to model reservoirs. A brief discussion of some concepts of differential geometry contrasts differences between Cartesian coordinates and curvilinear coordinates. A curvilinear coordinate system for modeling reservoir geometry is presented. Formulation of the conservation equations in curvilinear coordinates and the necessary modifications to pore volume and transmissibility are discussed. A numerical example illustrates the magnitude of the error that may result from some coordinate systems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract For most reservoirs the reservoir thickness and dip vary with position. For such reservoirs, the use of a Cartesian coordinate system is awkward as the coordinate surfaces are planes and the finite-difference grid elements are rectangular parallepipeds. However, these reservoirs may be efficiently parallepipeds. However, these reservoirs may be efficiently modeled with a curvilinear coordinate system that has coordinate surfaces that coincide with the reservoir surfaces. A procedure is presented that may be used to determine a curvilinear coordinate system that will conform with the geometry of the reservoir. The reservoir geometry is described by the depth of the top of the reservoir and the thickness. The mass conservation equations are presented in curvilinear coordinates. The finite-difference equations differ from the usual Cartesian coordinate formulation by a factor multiplying the pore volume and transmissibilities. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the magnitude of the error that may occur in the computed oil recovery if the Cartesian coordinate system is simply modified to yield the correct depth and pore volumes. Introduction Many reservoirs have a shape that is inconvenient and possibly inaccurate to model with Cartesian coordinates. The use of a curvilinear coordinate system that follows the shape of the reservoir can be advantageous for such reservoirs. The formulation discussed here will have the greatest advantage in modeling thin reservoirs but will have little advantage in modeling a reservoir whose thickness is greater than its radius of curvature, such as a pinnacle reef. pinnacle reef. In this paper the reader is introduced to various grid systems used to model reservoirs. A brief discussion of some concepts of differential geometry contrasts differences between Cartesian coordinates and curvilinear coordinates. A curvilinear coordinate system for modeling reservoir geometry is presented. Formulation of the conservation equations in curvilinear coordinates and the necessary modifications to pore volume and transmissibility are discussed. A numerical example illustrates the magnitude of the error that may result from some coordinate systems.

Key concepts: Curvilinear coordinates, Cartesian coordinate system, Coordinate system, Geometry, Reservoir simulation, Coordinate space, Geology, Curvature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Representation of Reservoir Geometry for Numerical Simulation — Research Paper | ScholarLens