2013Journal of Chemical EducationRequires access

Determination of Calcium in Powdered Milk via X-ray Fluorescence Using External Standard and Standard Addition Based Methods

Jason C. Chan, Peter T. Palmer

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

A handheld energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer was used to determine calcium in powdered milk. Quantification was performed using two different methods (external standards and the method of standard additions) to illustrate a matrix effect as well as a means for compensating for it. Both methods require calibration of the XRF analyzer using authentic standards prepared by mixing known masses of calcium carbonate into known masses of cellulose or dry milk. The use of XRF for this application requires analysis times on the order of 1 min per sample, provides linear calibration curves, and gives good precision with %RSDs of 4% or less. External standard based calibration gave erroneously low results due to the attenuation of calcium fluorescence by potassium in the sample, whereas the method of standard additions gave 1.29% calcium, which is very close to the manufacturer’s equivalent concentration of 1.3%. This experiment is well suited for an analytical chemistry course and provides an excellent example of the advantages and limitations of these two calibration methods for addressing matrix effects and deriving accurate quantitative results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A handheld energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer was used to determine calcium in powdered milk. Quantification was performed using two different methods (external standards and the method of standard additions) to illustrate a matrix effect as well as a means for compensating for it. Both methods require calibration of the XRF analyzer using authentic standards prepared by mixing known masses of calcium carbonate into known masses of cellulose or dry milk. The use of XRF for this application requires analysis times on the order of 1 min per sample, provides linear calibration curves, and gives good precision with %RSDs of 4% or less. External standard based calibration gave erroneously low results due to the attenuation of calcium fluorescence by potassium in the sample, whereas the method of standard additions gave 1.29% calcium, which is very close to the manufacturer’s equivalent concentration of 1.3%. This experiment is well suited for an analytical chemistry course and provides an excellent example of the advantages and limitations of these two calibration methods for addressing matrix effects and deriving accurate quantitative results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A handheld energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer was used to determine calcium in powdered milk. Quantification was performed using two different methods (external standards and the method of standard additions) to illustrate a matrix effect as well as a means for compensating for it. Both methods require calibration of the XRF analyzer using authentic standards prepared by mixing known masses of calcium carbonate into known masses of cellulose or dry milk. The use of XRF for this application requires analysis times on the order of 1 min per sample, provides linear calibration curves, and gives good precision with %RSDs of 4% or less. External standard based calibration gave erroneously low results due to the attenuation of calcium fluorescence by potassium in the sample, whereas the method of standard additions gave 1.29% calcium, which is very close to the manufacturer’s equivalent concentration of 1.3%. This experiment is well suited for an analytical chemistry course and provides an excellent example of the advantages and limitations of these two calibration methods for addressing matrix effects and deriving accurate quantitative results.

Key concepts: Standard addition, Calibration, Standard solution, Analytical Chemistry (journal), Chemistry, Calibration curve, Spectrum analyzer, Sample preparation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determination of Calcium in Powdered Milk via X-ray Fluorescence Using External Standard and Standard Addition Based Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens