2009Australian Journal of Earth SciencesOpen access

Complete spherical Bouguer gravity anomalies over Australia

Michael Kühn, W. E. Featherstone, J. F. Kirby

Open full text 53 citations

Abstract

Complete (or refined) spherical Bouguer gravity anomalies have been computed for all 1 095 065 land gravity observations in the June 2007 release of the Australian national gravity database. The spherical Bouguer shell contribution was computed using the supplied ground elevations of the gravity observations. The spherical terrain corrections, residual to each Bouguer shell, were computed on a 9 arc-second grid (∼250 m by ∼250 m spatial resolution) from a global Newtonian integration using heights from version 2.1 of the GEODATA digital elevation model (DEM) over Australia and the GLOBE and JGP95E global DEMs outside Australia. A constant topographic mass-density of 2670 kg/m3 was used for both the spherical Bouguer shell and spherical terrain correction terms. The difference between the complete spherical and complete planar Bouguer gravity anomaly exhibits an almost constant bias of about −18.7 mGal over areas with moderate elevation changes, thus verifying the planar model as a reasonable approximation in these areas. However, the results suggest that in mountainous areas with large elevation changes, the complete spherical Bouguer gravity anomaly should be selected in preference over the less-rigorous complete planar counterpart.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Complete (or refined) spherical Bouguer gravity anomalies have been computed for all 1 095 065 land gravity observations in the June 2007 release of the Australian national gravity database. The spherical Bouguer shell contribution was computed using the supplied ground elevations of the gravity observations. The spherical terrain corrections, residual to each Bouguer shell, were computed on a 9 arc-second grid (∼250 m by ∼250 m spatial resolution) from a global Newtonian integration using heights from version 2.1 of the GEODATA digital elevation model (DEM) over Australia and the GLOBE and JGP95E global DEMs outside Australia. A constant topographic mass-density of 2670 kg/m3 was used for both the spherical Bouguer shell and spherical terrain correction terms. The difference between the complete spherical and complete planar Bouguer gravity anomaly exhibits an almost constant bias of about −18.7 mGal over areas with moderate elevation changes, thus verifying the planar model as a reasonable approximation in these areas. However, the results suggest that in mountainous areas with large elevation changes, the complete spherical Bouguer gravity anomaly should be selected in preference over the less-rigorous complete planar counterpart.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Complete (or refined) spherical Bouguer gravity anomalies have been computed for all 1 095 065 land gravity observations in the June 2007 release of the Australian national gravity database. The spherical Bouguer shell contribution was computed using the supplied ground elevations of the gravity observations. The spherical terrain corrections, residual to each Bouguer shell, were computed on a 9 arc-second grid (∼250 m by ∼250 m spatial resolution) from a global Newtonian integration using heights from version 2.1 of the GEODATA digital elevation model (DEM) over Australia and the GLOBE and JGP95E global DEMs outside Australia. A constant topographic mass-density of 2670 kg/m3 was used for both the spherical Bouguer shell and spherical terrain correction terms. The difference between the complete spherical and complete planar Bouguer gravity anomaly exhibits an almost constant bias of about −18.7 mGal over areas with moderate elevation changes, thus verifying the planar model as a reasonable approximation in these areas. However, the results suggest that in mountainous areas with large elevation changes, the complete spherical Bouguer gravity anomaly should be selected in preference over the less-rigorous complete planar counterpart.

Key concepts: Bouguer anomaly, Geology, Digital elevation model, Free-air gravity anomaly, Elevation (ballistics), Geodesy, Gravity anomaly, Terrain

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Complete spherical Bouguer gravity anomalies over Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens