2007•Cerebrovascular DiseasesRequires access

Patent Foramen Ovale: A Potential Source of Cerebral Embolism?

Ulf Schminke, Stefanie R. Ries, Michael Daffertshofer, U. Staedt, Michael G. Hennerici

Open publisher page 55 citations

Abstract

Since the introduction of contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) and contrast transcranial Doppler sonography (cTCD) the incidence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has increased, especially in young patients with stroke of unknown etiology. A hundred patients with cerebral ischemia (60 with otherwise unidentified origin and 40 with different sources of cerebral ischemia) were prospectively examined by both methods. cTCD was used in all patients for the detection of microbubbles (< 8 µm in diameter) monitored in both middle cerebral arteries after intravenous administration. cTEE studies were made in 65 patients. Both methods agreed in 55/65 (85%); a right-to-left shunt was observed in 21/65 (32%), negative results in 34/65 (52%). Discordance occurred in 10/65 (16 %); in 8/10, only cTCD revealed positive results probably due to small pulmonary arteriovenous shunts which were not visualized by cTEE. In total, a PFO was diagnosed in 41/100; in patients without source of cerebral ischemia, 33/60 (55%) had evidence of a PFO; in 8/40 (20%), the results contributed to the detection of multiple possible sources of cerebral ischemia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the introduction of contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) and contrast transcranial Doppler sonography (cTCD) the incidence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has increased, especially in young patients with stroke of unknown etiology. A hundred patients with cerebral ischemia (60 with otherwise unidentified origin and 40 with different sources of cerebral ischemia) were prospectively examined by both methods. cTCD was used in all patients for the detection of microbubbles (< 8 µm in diameter) monitored in both middle cerebral arteries after intravenous administration. cTEE studies were made in 65 patients. Both methods agreed in 55/65 (85%); a right-to-left shunt was observed in 21/65 (32%), negative results in 34/65 (52%). Discordance occurred in 10/65 (16 %); in 8/10, only cTCD revealed positive results probably due to small pulmonary arteriovenous shunts which were not visualized by cTEE. In total, a PFO was diagnosed in 41/100; in patients without source of cerebral ischemia, 33/60 (55%) had evidence of a PFO; in 8/40 (20%), the results contributed to the detection of multiple possible sources of cerebral ischemia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 55 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the introduction of contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) and contrast transcranial Doppler sonography (cTCD) the incidence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has increased, especially in young patients with stroke of unknown etiology. A hundred patients with cerebral ischemia (60 with otherwise unidentified origin and 40 with different sources of cerebral ischemia) were prospectively examined by both methods. cTCD was used in all patients for the detection of microbubbles (< 8 µm in diameter) monitored in both middle cerebral arteries after intravenous administration. cTEE studies were made in 65 patients. Both methods agreed in 55/65 (85%); a right-to-left shunt was observed in 21/65 (32%), negative results in 34/65 (52%). Discordance occurred in 10/65 (16 %); in 8/10, only cTCD revealed positive results probably due to small pulmonary arteriovenous shunts which were not visualized by cTEE. In total, a PFO was diagnosed in 41/100; in patients without source of cerebral ischemia, 33/60 (55%) had evidence of a PFO; in 8/40 (20%), the results contributed to the detection of multiple possible sources of cerebral ischemia.

Key concepts: Medicine, Patent foramen ovale, Cerebral embolism, Cardiology, Stroke (engine), Paradoxical embolism, Foramen ovale (heart), Embolism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Patent Foramen Ovale: A Potential Source of Cerebral Embolism? — Research Paper | ScholarLens