2013European Heart JournalOpen access

Initial management of severe malignant pericardial effusion with percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy

Juan Ruiz-García, Santiago Jiménez Valero, Gabriel Galeote, Ángel Sánchez‐Recalde, Luís Calvo, Sebastián Carrizo, S. Valbuena Lopez, L. Moreno, Ignacio Plaza, Raúl Moreno

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is associated with adverse outcomes and presents a high rate of recurrence after pericardiocentesis. Various approaches have been reported for prevention of recurrences. However most of them are associated with significant morbidity or even mortality and required unnecessarily prolonged hospital stay. We sought to confirm the efficacy of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (PPB) as the initial treatment of choice for MPE. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the clinical, echocardiographic and follow-up characteristics of a consecutive series of PPB carried out in a single center in patients with advanced cancer. Results: Twenty-one PPB were performed in 19 patients with a mean age of 65±15 years. Seventeen patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic neoplastic disease and in another two patients there was a high radiological suspicion of it. Three patients had previously required pericardiocentesis, and in the remaining patients PPB constituted the first treatment for the MPE. All patients had a severe (>20mm) circumferential effusion and only one patient did not have evidence of hemodynamic compromise on echocardiography. In all cases the procedure was initially successful, there were no acute complications, and it was well tolerated at the first attempt. There were no infectious complications, and just one patient developed a large pleural effusion that did not require treatment. During the follow-up (median 74 [IQR 31.5-207.5] days), four patients required a new pericardial procedure: 2 elective pericardial window surgeries and 2 new PPB. Conclusions: PPB is a simple, safe procedure that can be effective in the prevention of recurrences in many patients with MPE. Based on the results and the poor prognosis of these patients we believe that PPB might be considered the initial treatment of choice for most MPE.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is associated with adverse outcomes and presents a high rate of recurrence after pericardiocentesis. Various approaches have been reported for prevention of recurrences. However most of them are associated with significant morbidity or even mortality and required unnecessarily prolonged hospital stay. We sought to confirm the efficacy of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (PPB) as the initial treatment of choice for MPE. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the clinical, echocardiographic and follow-up characteristics of a consecutive series of PPB carried out in a single center in patients with advanced cancer. Results: Twenty-one PPB were performed in 19 patients with a mean age of 65±15 years. Seventeen patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic neoplastic disease and in another two patients there was a high radiological suspicion of it. Three patients had previously required pericardiocentesis, and in the remaining patients PPB constituted the first treatment for the MPE. All patients had a severe (>20mm) circumferential effusion and only one patient did not have evidence of hemodynamic compromise on echocardiography. In all cases the procedure was initially successful, there were no acute complications, and it was well tolerated at the first attempt. There were no infectious complications, and just one patient developed a large pleural effusion that did not require treatment. During the follow-up (median 74 [IQR 31.5-207.5] days), four patients required a new pericardial procedure: 2 elective pericardial window surgeries and 2 new PPB. Conclusions: PPB is a simple, safe procedure that can be effective in the prevention of recurrences in many patients with MPE. Based on the results and the poor prognosis of these patients we believe that PPB might be considered the initial treatment of choice for most MPE.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is associated with adverse outcomes and presents a high rate of recurrence after pericardiocentesis. Various approaches have been reported for prevention of recurrences. However most of them are associated with significant morbidity or even mortality and required unnecessarily prolonged hospital stay. We sought to confirm the efficacy of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (PPB) as the initial treatment of choice for MPE. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the clinical, echocardiographic and follow-up characteristics of a consecutive series of PPB carried out in a single center in patients with advanced cancer. Results: Twenty-one PPB were performed in 19 patients with a mean age of 65±15 years. Seventeen patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic neoplastic disease and in another two patients there was a high radiological suspicion of it. Three patients had previously required pericardiocentesis, and in the remaining patients PPB constituted the first treatment for the MPE. All patients had a severe (>20mm) circumferential effusion and only one patient did not have evidence of hemodynamic compromise on echocardiography. In all cases the procedure was initially successful, there were no acute complications, and it was well tolerated at the first attempt. There were no infectious complications, and just one patient developed a large pleural effusion that did not require treatment. During the follow-up (median 74 [IQR 31.5-207.5] days), four patients required a new pericardial procedure: 2 elective pericardial window surgeries and 2 new PPB. Conclusions: PPB is a simple, safe procedure that can be effective in the prevention of recurrences in many patients with MPE. Based on the results and the poor prognosis of these patients we believe that PPB might be considered the initial treatment of choice for most MPE.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pericardial effusion, Percutaneous, Balloon, Radiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Initial management of severe malignant pericardial effusion with percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens