1993•Journal of Hydraulic EngineeringRequires access

Validation of Three‐Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model of Chesapeake Bay

Billy H. Johnson, Keu W. Kim, Ronald E. Heath, Bernard B. Hsieh, H. Lee Butler

Open publisher page 135 citations

Abstract

A time‐varying three‐dimensional numerical hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay in Maryland has been developed to provide flow fields to a 3‐D water quality model of the bay. The water surface, 3‐D velocity field, salinity, and temperature are computed. Major physical processes affecting bay circulation and vertical mixing are modeled. A particular feature of the model is the solution of transformed equations on a boundary‐fitted grid in the horizontal plane. The 3‐D model has been validated through application to six data sets. The first three were about one month long each and represented a dry summer condition, a spring runoff, and a fall wind‐mixing event. The last three applications were yearlong simulations for 1984, 1985, and 1986. These years represent a wet, dry, and average freshwater inflow year, respectively. A major storm in November 1985 over the lower portion of the bay resulted in a 200‐year flood on the James River and served to demonstrate the ability of the model to simulate extreme events. Selected results from application to the fall 1983 data and from the yearlong simulations are presented here. These results demonstrate that the model is a good representation of the hydrodynamics of the Chesapeake Bay and its major tributaries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A time‐varying three‐dimensional numerical hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay in Maryland has been developed to provide flow fields to a 3‐D water quality model of the bay. The water surface, 3‐D velocity field, salinity, and temperature are computed. Major physical processes affecting bay circulation and vertical mixing are modeled. A particular feature of the model is the solution of transformed equations on a boundary‐fitted grid in the horizontal plane. The 3‐D model has been validated through application to six data sets. The first three were about one month long each and represented a dry summer condition, a spring runoff, and a fall wind‐mixing event. The last three applications were yearlong simulations for 1984, 1985, and 1986. These years represent a wet, dry, and average freshwater inflow year, respectively. A major storm in November 1985 over the lower portion of the bay resulted in a 200‐year flood on the James River and served to demonstrate the ability of the model to simulate extreme events. Selected results from application to the fall 1983 data and from the yearlong simulations are presented here. These results demonstrate that the model is a good representation of the hydrodynamics of the Chesapeake Bay and its major tributaries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 135 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A time‐varying three‐dimensional numerical hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay in Maryland has been developed to provide flow fields to a 3‐D water quality model of the bay. The water surface, 3‐D velocity field, salinity, and temperature are computed. Major physical processes affecting bay circulation and vertical mixing are modeled. A particular feature of the model is the solution of transformed equations on a boundary‐fitted grid in the horizontal plane. The 3‐D model has been validated through application to six data sets. The first three were about one month long each and represented a dry summer condition, a spring runoff, and a fall wind‐mixing event. The last three applications were yearlong simulations for 1984, 1985, and 1986. These years represent a wet, dry, and average freshwater inflow year, respectively. A major storm in November 1985 over the lower portion of the bay resulted in a 200‐year flood on the James River and served to demonstrate the ability of the model to simulate extreme events. Selected results from application to the fall 1983 data and from the yearlong simulations are presented here. These results demonstrate that the model is a good representation of the hydrodynamics of the Chesapeake Bay and its major tributaries.

Key concepts: Tributary, Bay, Hydrology (agriculture), Storm, Inflow, Environmental science, Surface runoff, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Validation of Three‐Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model of Chesapeake Bay — Research Paper | ScholarLens