Stimulus specificity of physiological response to stress and the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern.
Steve Goldband
Abstract
Steve Goldband
Abstract
Two experiments were performed to determine the influence of stimulus specificity on differences in physiological response to stress of coronary-prone (Type A) and non-coronary-prone (Type B) individuals. In the first experiment, a reaction time task was presented to male undergraduates with and without stress relevant to the Type A behavior pattern. The physiological responses of Type A subjects were greater in the relevant stress compared to the neutral task condition, but the responses of Type B subjects were similar in the two conditions. In the second experiment, Type A and type B subjects performed a stressful task that was not theoretically relevant to the Type A behavior pattern. Physiological response elevations were found for both groups, but as predicted, there were no differences between Type A and Type B subjects. The results are discussed as support for the discriminant validity of the Type A construct and as additional evidence for the role of physiological response differences as mediators of the behavior-pattern-disease relationship.
OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two experiments were performed to determine the influence of stimulus specificity on differences in physiological response to stress of coronary-prone (Type A) and non-coronary-prone (Type B) individuals. In the first experiment, a reaction time task was presented to male undergraduates with and without stress relevant to the Type A behavior pattern. The physiological responses of Type A subjects were greater in the relevant stress compared to the neutral task condition, but the responses of Type B subjects were similar in the two conditions. In the second experiment, Type A and type B subjects performed a stressful task that was not theoretically relevant to the Type A behavior pattern. Physiological response elevations were found for both groups, but as predicted, there were no differences between Type A and Type B subjects. The results are discussed as support for the discriminant validity of the Type A construct and as additional evidence for the role of physiological response differences as mediators of the behavior-pattern-disease relationship.
Key concepts: Type A and Type B personality theory, Psychology, Stimulus (psychology), Developmental psychology, Audiology, Cognitive psychology, Social psychology, Personality