1972Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica Section B Microbiology and ImmunologyRequires access

Direct and Indirect Immunofluorescence of Unfixed and Fixed Mycoplasma Colonies

S Røsendal, Finn T. Black

Open publisher page 224 citations

Abstract

This report provides a description of indirect immunofluorescence of unfixed mycoplasma colonies (“indirect epifluorescence”). Comparison was made between direct and indirect immunofluorescence using unfixed and hot water fixed colonies. 7 mycoplasma strains were used, 6 of canine and 1 of human (M. pneumoniae) origin. It is concluded that indirect immunofluorescence of unfixed colonies is a useful serological method of identification. It is more sensitive than and equally specific as direct immunofluorescence and in addition does not give the background fluorescence associated with that method. It is also concluded that direct and indirect immunofluorescence of hot water fixed colonies is too unspecific for the identification of canine mycoplasma species. M. pneumoniae appears to differ in this respect as its antigenic specificity is apparently better retained during hot water fixation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report provides a description of indirect immunofluorescence of unfixed mycoplasma colonies (“indirect epifluorescence”). Comparison was made between direct and indirect immunofluorescence using unfixed and hot water fixed colonies. 7 mycoplasma strains were used, 6 of canine and 1 of human (M. pneumoniae) origin. It is concluded that indirect immunofluorescence of unfixed colonies is a useful serological method of identification. It is more sensitive than and equally specific as direct immunofluorescence and in addition does not give the background fluorescence associated with that method. It is also concluded that direct and indirect immunofluorescence of hot water fixed colonies is too unspecific for the identification of canine mycoplasma species. M. pneumoniae appears to differ in this respect as its antigenic specificity is apparently better retained during hot water fixation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 224 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report provides a description of indirect immunofluorescence of unfixed mycoplasma colonies (“indirect epifluorescence”). Comparison was made between direct and indirect immunofluorescence using unfixed and hot water fixed colonies. 7 mycoplasma strains were used, 6 of canine and 1 of human (M. pneumoniae) origin. It is concluded that indirect immunofluorescence of unfixed colonies is a useful serological method of identification. It is more sensitive than and equally specific as direct immunofluorescence and in addition does not give the background fluorescence associated with that method. It is also concluded that direct and indirect immunofluorescence of hot water fixed colonies is too unspecific for the identification of canine mycoplasma species. M. pneumoniae appears to differ in this respect as its antigenic specificity is apparently better retained during hot water fixation.

Key concepts: Immunofluorescence, Direct fluorescent antibody, Indirect immunofluorescence, Biology, Serology, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Antigen, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Direct and Indirect Immunofluorescence of Unfixed and Fixed Mycoplasma Colonies — Research Paper | ScholarLens