1974Journal of Fish BiologyRequires access

A population study of Barbus barbus (L.) in the River Severn, England

P. C. Hunt, John W. Jones

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

Five hundred and thirty one of a total of 3122 tagged Barbus barbus (L.) in the middle Severn were recaptured using electric fishing and angling. Ninety two barbel were recaught downstream of the site of tagging, 152 upstream and 287 did not move. Electric fishing was selective for home recaptures. The barbel population was divisible into mobile and static components; 86% remained within 5 km, the remainder wandering more widely up to a maximum of 34 km from their site of tagging. Movement seemed to be dependent on size of the fish.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Five hundred and thirty one of a total of 3122 tagged Barbus barbus (L.) in the middle Severn were recaptured using electric fishing and angling. Ninety two barbel were recaught downstream of the site of tagging, 152 upstream and 287 did not move. Electric fishing was selective for home recaptures. The barbel population was divisible into mobile and static components; 86% remained within 5 km, the remainder wandering more widely up to a maximum of 34 km from their site of tagging. Movement seemed to be dependent on size of the fish.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Five hundred and thirty one of a total of 3122 tagged Barbus barbus (L.) in the middle Severn were recaptured using electric fishing and angling. Ninety two barbel were recaught downstream of the site of tagging, 152 upstream and 287 did not move. Electric fishing was selective for home recaptures. The barbel population was divisible into mobile and static components; 86% remained within 5 km, the remainder wandering more widely up to a maximum of 34 km from their site of tagging. Movement seemed to be dependent on size of the fish.

Key concepts: Barbel, Barbus, Fishing, Biology, Fishery, Population, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Cyprinidae

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A population study of Barbus barbus (L.) in the River Severn, England — Research Paper | ScholarLens