2011•Journal of Applied PhysicsRequires access

Noise investigation of the orthogonal fluxgate employing alternating direct current bias

Eyal Weiss, Eugene Paperno

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Alternating dc bias enables eliminating offset in orthogonal fluxgates operated in fundamental mode. However, the alternating dc bias reversals increase the fluxgate magnetic noise. It is shown in this work that the excess magnetic noise is related to the dynamics of the magnetic domains in the fluxgate core. The alternating dc bias reverses the fluxgate core magnetization causing nucleating domains and generating an intensive magnetic noise. To suppress the excess noise, two methods are suggested. The first method is based on eliminating the adequate parts of the fluxgate output appearing right after each dc bias reversal. The second method is based on introducing idle intervals between the dc bias reversals and subsequently eliminating the corresponding idle samples in the fluxgate output. Both methods suppress one and the same noise attributed to the domains relaxation dynamics and, hence, lead to similar results. In both cases, the fluxgate noise has been reduced down to its value in the excitation mode, where the dc bias is constant, and there are no reversals in the fluxgate core magnetization. The second method, however, has an advantage of lower power consumption due to the absence of both the ac and dc excitations during the idle intervals. Reducing the excess noise in the alternating dc bias mode, paves the way for developing a low-noise orthogonal fluxgates with practically no offset.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Alternating dc bias enables eliminating offset in orthogonal fluxgates operated in fundamental mode. However, the alternating dc bias reversals increase the fluxgate magnetic noise. It is shown in this work that the excess magnetic noise is related to the dynamics of the magnetic domains in the fluxgate core. The alternating dc bias reverses the fluxgate core magnetization causing nucleating domains and generating an intensive magnetic noise. To suppress the excess noise, two methods are suggested. The first method is based on eliminating the adequate parts of the fluxgate output appearing right after each dc bias reversal. The second method is based on introducing idle intervals between the dc bias reversals and subsequently eliminating the corresponding idle samples in the fluxgate output. Both methods suppress one and the same noise attributed to the domains relaxation dynamics and, hence, lead to similar results. In both cases, the fluxgate noise has been reduced down to its value in the excitation mode, where the dc bias is constant, and there are no reversals in the fluxgate core magnetization. The second method, however, has an advantage of lower power consumption due to the absence of both the ac and dc excitations during the idle intervals. Reducing the excess noise in the alternating dc bias mode, paves the way for developing a low-noise orthogonal fluxgates with practically no offset.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Alternating dc bias enables eliminating offset in orthogonal fluxgates operated in fundamental mode. However, the alternating dc bias reversals increase the fluxgate magnetic noise. It is shown in this work that the excess magnetic noise is related to the dynamics of the magnetic domains in the fluxgate core. The alternating dc bias reverses the fluxgate core magnetization causing nucleating domains and generating an intensive magnetic noise. To suppress the excess noise, two methods are suggested. The first method is based on eliminating the adequate parts of the fluxgate output appearing right after each dc bias reversal. The second method is based on introducing idle intervals between the dc bias reversals and subsequently eliminating the corresponding idle samples in the fluxgate output. Both methods suppress one and the same noise attributed to the domains relaxation dynamics and, hence, lead to similar results. In both cases, the fluxgate noise has been reduced down to its value in the excitation mode, where the dc bias is constant, and there are no reversals in the fluxgate core magnetization. The second method, however, has an advantage of lower power consumption due to the absence of both the ac and dc excitations during the idle intervals. Reducing the excess noise in the alternating dc bias mode, paves the way for developing a low-noise orthogonal fluxgates with practically no offset.

Key concepts: Fluxgate compass, DC bias, Noise (video), Offset (computer science), Direct current, Alternating current, Magnetic noise, Nuclear magnetic resonance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Noise investigation of the orthogonal fluxgate employing alternating direct current bias — Research Paper | ScholarLens