Teicoplanin, vancomycin, rifampicin: in-vivo and in-vitro studies with Staphylococcus aureus
Holliday T. Carper, Gail W. Sullivan, Gerald L. Mandell
Abstract
Holliday T. Carper, Gail W. Sullivan, Gerald L. Mandell
Abstract
Groups of mice infected with 3.3 X 10(8) Staphylococcus aureus via the tail vein were treated three days later with rifampicin (13 mg/kg), vancomycin (33 mg/kg), or teicoplanin (33 mg/kg). Rifampicin was the most effective agent (28 out of 29 survivors). Vancomycin and teicoplanin were of equivalent efficacy (21 of 29 and 24 of 29 survivors, respectively). When intraleucocytic staphylococci were incubated with rifampicin (1 or 20 mg/l), vancomycin (100 mg/l), or teicoplanin (100 mg/l), rifampicin was the most active drug. Vancomycin and teicoplanin were similar.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Groups of mice infected with 3.3 X 10(8) Staphylococcus aureus via the tail vein were treated three days later with rifampicin (13 mg/kg), vancomycin (33 mg/kg), or teicoplanin (33 mg/kg). Rifampicin was the most effective agent (28 out of 29 survivors). Vancomycin and teicoplanin were of equivalent efficacy (21 of 29 and 24 of 29 survivors, respectively). When intraleucocytic staphylococci were incubated with rifampicin (1 or 20 mg/l), vancomycin (100 mg/l), or teicoplanin (100 mg/l), rifampicin was the most active drug. Vancomycin and teicoplanin were similar.
Key concepts: Teicoplanin, Vancomycin, Rifampicin, Staphylococcus aureus, Medicine, Microbiology, Antibiotics, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus