Conceptualizing Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution as Distinct Negotiation Processes in the Context of the Enduring Israeli–Palestinian Conflict
Ruth Ben-Artzi, Moty Cristal, Shirli Kopelman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Ruth Ben-Artzi, Moty Cristal, Shirli Kopelman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract Negotiations in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict are historically traced and compared through an analysis of conflict resolution (CR) and conflict management (CM), defined as distinct negotiation processes. The assumption thatCMis a stepping‐stone toCRis challenged: Linking the two processes has not only entrenched but exacerbated this enduring conflict. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Negotiations in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict are historically traced and compared through an analysis of conflict resolution (CR) and conflict management (CM), defined as distinct negotiation processes. The assumption thatCMis a stepping‐stone toCRis challenged: Linking the two processes has not only entrenched but exacerbated this enduring conflict. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Key concepts: Negotiation, Conflict resolution, Conflict management, Conflict resolution research, Context (archaeology), Conflict analysis, Political science, Organizational conflict