1991Clinical Journal of Sport MedicineRequires access

Criteria for Return to Contact Activities Following Cervical Spine Injury

Joseph S. Torg, Steven G. Glasgow

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

The literature dealing with the diagnosis and treatment of cervical spine injuries is considerable. Absent, however, are comprehensive criteria or guidelines for permitting or prohibiting return to contact activities. The purpose of this report is to describe congenital, developmental, as well as posttraumatic conditions of the cervical spine as presenting either (a) no contraindication, (b) relative contraindication, or (c) an absolute contraindication to continued participation. In addition to reviewing the relevant concepts of Bailes, Watkins, and White, a comprehensive set of guidelines is presented. In addition, “spear tackler's spine,” an absolute contraindication to participation, is described. Also, recommendations for managing individuals following cervical spine fusion are suggested.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The literature dealing with the diagnosis and treatment of cervical spine injuries is considerable. Absent, however, are comprehensive criteria or guidelines for permitting or prohibiting return to contact activities. The purpose of this report is to describe congenital, developmental, as well as posttraumatic conditions of the cervical spine as presenting either (a) no contraindication, (b) relative contraindication, or (c) an absolute contraindication to continued participation. In addition to reviewing the relevant concepts of Bailes, Watkins, and White, a comprehensive set of guidelines is presented. In addition, “spear tackler's spine,” an absolute contraindication to participation, is described. Also, recommendations for managing individuals following cervical spine fusion are suggested.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The literature dealing with the diagnosis and treatment of cervical spine injuries is considerable. Absent, however, are comprehensive criteria or guidelines for permitting or prohibiting return to contact activities. The purpose of this report is to describe congenital, developmental, as well as posttraumatic conditions of the cervical spine as presenting either (a) no contraindication, (b) relative contraindication, or (c) an absolute contraindication to continued participation. In addition to reviewing the relevant concepts of Bailes, Watkins, and White, a comprehensive set of guidelines is presented. In addition, “spear tackler's spine,” an absolute contraindication to participation, is described. Also, recommendations for managing individuals following cervical spine fusion are suggested.

Key concepts: Contraindication, Medicine, Cervical spine, Surgery, Pathology, Alternative medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Criteria for Return to Contact Activities Following Cervical Spine Injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens