Judgments of Grammaticality as Related to Judgments of Meaningfulness and Ordinariness
Hiroshi Nagata
Abstract
Hiroshi Nagata
Abstract
44 students judged two types of ungrammatical sentences, Kuno's and Chomsky's, for their grammaticality, meaningfulness, and ordinariness. Whether judgments of grammaticality were predicted by the remaining two judgments was explored. Analysis showed that judged grammaticality of Kuno's items was predicted significantly by judged meaningfulness and ordinariness while that of Chomsky's items was predicted only by judged meaningfulness. This indicates that the relative contribution by judged meaningfulness and ordinariness toward predicting judged grammaticality depends on the type of ungrammaticality of the sentences judged.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
44 students judged two types of ungrammatical sentences, Kuno's and Chomsky's, for their grammaticality, meaningfulness, and ordinariness. Whether judgments of grammaticality were predicted by the remaining two judgments was explored. Analysis showed that judged grammaticality of Kuno's items was predicted significantly by judged meaningfulness and ordinariness while that of Chomsky's items was predicted only by judged meaningfulness. This indicates that the relative contribution by judged meaningfulness and ordinariness toward predicting judged grammaticality depends on the type of ungrammaticality of the sentences judged.
Key concepts: Grammaticality, Psychology, Cognitive psychology, Linguistics, Grammar, Philosophy