2013•Desalination and Water TreatmentOpen access

Greywater treatment using different designs of sand filters

Hussein I. Abdel‐Shafy, Mohamed A. El‐Khateeb, M. Shehata

Open full text 71 citations

Abstract

Different designs of sand filter as a secondary treatment step for the treatment of the primary sedimented effluent were studied. Gravel filter down flow (GFDF), gravel filter up flow (GFUF), sand filter down flow (SFDF), gravel filter followed by sand filter (GFSF), and horizontal flow sand filter (HFSF) were used as a secondary treatment step. During the study period, GFDF, GFUF, and SFDF were operated with an influent flow rate of 173 m3/m2/d, while GFSF and HFSF were operated at flow rate of 86.5 m3/m2/d. The final effluent of GFSF and HFSF were found to be complying with the National Regulatory Standards for the treated effluent reuse in irrigation. The residual concentration of COD, BOD5, and TSS for GFSF was 43, 16, and 7.5 while, the corresponding concentration for HFSF was 40, 17, and 9 mg/l, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Different designs of sand filter as a secondary treatment step for the treatment of the primary sedimented effluent were studied. Gravel filter down flow (GFDF), gravel filter up flow (GFUF), sand filter down flow (SFDF), gravel filter followed by sand filter (GFSF), and horizontal flow sand filter (HFSF) were used as a secondary treatment step. During the study period, GFDF, GFUF, and SFDF were operated with an influent flow rate of 173 m3/m2/d, while GFSF and HFSF were operated at flow rate of 86.5 m3/m2/d. The final effluent of GFSF and HFSF were found to be complying with the National Regulatory Standards for the treated effluent reuse in irrigation. The residual concentration of COD, BOD5, and TSS for GFSF was 43, 16, and 7.5 while, the corresponding concentration for HFSF was 40, 17, and 9 mg/l, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Different designs of sand filter as a secondary treatment step for the treatment of the primary sedimented effluent were studied. Gravel filter down flow (GFDF), gravel filter up flow (GFUF), sand filter down flow (SFDF), gravel filter followed by sand filter (GFSF), and horizontal flow sand filter (HFSF) were used as a secondary treatment step. During the study period, GFDF, GFUF, and SFDF were operated with an influent flow rate of 173 m3/m2/d, while GFSF and HFSF were operated at flow rate of 86.5 m3/m2/d. The final effluent of GFSF and HFSF were found to be complying with the National Regulatory Standards for the treated effluent reuse in irrigation. The residual concentration of COD, BOD5, and TSS for GFSF was 43, 16, and 7.5 while, the corresponding concentration for HFSF was 40, 17, and 9 mg/l, respectively.

Key concepts: Effluent, Filter (signal processing), Greywater, Sand filter, Environmental science, Volumetric flow rate, Environmental engineering, Reuse

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Greywater treatment using different designs of sand filters — Research Paper | ScholarLens