What's in a name? India's tryst with secularism
Ian Copland
Abstract
Ian Copland
Abstract
It has always been the claim of India's politicians that their country is a ‘secular’ state. However, although the Preamble to the Constitution of 1950 proclaims India to be ‘democratic’, it makes no mention of secularism. Fobbed off at the time as of no consequence, this omission was quite deliberate and reflected an awareness on the part of the designers of the constitution, notably Nehru and Ambedkar, that its provisions under ‘freedom of religion’ did not amount to what they understood to be ‘real’ secularism, namely the kind of polity famously embodied in the 1791 First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It has always been the claim of India's politicians that their country is a ‘secular’ state. However, although the Preamble to the Constitution of 1950 proclaims India to be ‘democratic’, it makes no mention of secularism. Fobbed off at the time as of no consequence, this omission was quite deliberate and reflected an awareness on the part of the designers of the constitution, notably Nehru and Ambedkar, that its provisions under ‘freedom of religion’ did not amount to what they understood to be ‘real’ secularism, namely the kind of polity famously embodied in the 1791 First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Key concepts: Secularism, Political science, Philosophy, Law, Politics