2010•Commonwealth and Comparative PoliticsRequires access

What's in a name? India's tryst with secularism

Ian Copland

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

It has always been the claim of India's politicians that their country is a ‘secular’ state. However, although the Preamble to the Constitution of 1950 proclaims India to be ‘democratic’, it makes no mention of secularism. Fobbed off at the time as of no consequence, this omission was quite deliberate and reflected an awareness on the part of the designers of the constitution, notably Nehru and Ambedkar, that its provisions under ‘freedom of religion’ did not amount to what they understood to be ‘real’ secularism, namely the kind of polity famously embodied in the 1791 First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has always been the claim of India's politicians that their country is a ‘secular’ state. However, although the Preamble to the Constitution of 1950 proclaims India to be ‘democratic’, it makes no mention of secularism. Fobbed off at the time as of no consequence, this omission was quite deliberate and reflected an awareness on the part of the designers of the constitution, notably Nehru and Ambedkar, that its provisions under ‘freedom of religion’ did not amount to what they understood to be ‘real’ secularism, namely the kind of polity famously embodied in the 1791 First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has always been the claim of India's politicians that their country is a ‘secular’ state. However, although the Preamble to the Constitution of 1950 proclaims India to be ‘democratic’, it makes no mention of secularism. Fobbed off at the time as of no consequence, this omission was quite deliberate and reflected an awareness on the part of the designers of the constitution, notably Nehru and Ambedkar, that its provisions under ‘freedom of religion’ did not amount to what they understood to be ‘real’ secularism, namely the kind of polity famously embodied in the 1791 First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Key concepts: Secularism, Political science, Philosophy, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What's in a name? India's tryst with secularism — Research Paper | ScholarLens