1929Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineRequires access

TUBERCULIN SKIN REACTIONS

Charles Hendee Smith

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

In 1890, Koch introduced the general or subcutaneous tuberculin reaction. In 1902, Branner noted a local skin reaction around the site of therapeutic injections of tuberculin. Pirquet1described his cutaneous scratch test in 1907; in the same year Wolff-Eisner and Calmette brought out the conjunctival test, and Morro introduced the percutaneous or inunction test. In 1908, Mantoux2described the intracutaneous test. In 1909, Hamburger and Monti published the results in a series of cases tested with the Pirquet, followed by the "Stich" reaction. No noteworthy additions have been made to this list in twenty years. In all these tests the essential principle is the same, the object being to bring tuberculin into contact with the deeper epithelial cells. The success of the tests depends entirely on the accuracy with which this contact is established, and therefore the Mantoux and Stich reactions should be expected to be more certain

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1890, Koch introduced the general or subcutaneous tuberculin reaction. In 1902, Branner noted a local skin reaction around the site of therapeutic injections of tuberculin. Pirquet1described his cutaneous scratch test in 1907; in the same year Wolff-Eisner and Calmette brought out the conjunctival test, and Morro introduced the percutaneous or inunction test. In 1908, Mantoux2described the intracutaneous test. In 1909, Hamburger and Monti published the results in a series of cases tested with the Pirquet, followed by the "Stich" reaction. No noteworthy additions have been made to this list in twenty years. In all these tests the essential principle is the same, the object being to bring tuberculin into contact with the deeper epithelial cells. The success of the tests depends entirely on the accuracy with which this contact is established, and therefore the Mantoux and Stich reactions should be expected to be more certain

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1890, Koch introduced the general or subcutaneous tuberculin reaction. In 1902, Branner noted a local skin reaction around the site of therapeutic injections of tuberculin. Pirquet1described his cutaneous scratch test in 1907; in the same year Wolff-Eisner and Calmette brought out the conjunctival test, and Morro introduced the percutaneous or inunction test. In 1908, Mantoux2described the intracutaneous test. In 1909, Hamburger and Monti published the results in a series of cases tested with the Pirquet, followed by the "Stich" reaction. No noteworthy additions have been made to this list in twenty years. In all these tests the essential principle is the same, the object being to bring tuberculin into contact with the deeper epithelial cells. The success of the tests depends entirely on the accuracy with which this contact is established, and therefore the Mantoux and Stich reactions should be expected to be more certain

Key concepts: Tuberculin, Mantoux test, Tuberculin test, Skin reaction, Skin test, Medicine, Dermatology, Patch test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source