1975PubMedRequires access

Ipsilateral acoustic reflex stimulation in normal and sensorineural impaired ears: a preliminary report.

Thomas J. Fria, J. LeBlanc, R. Kristensen, Alberti Pw

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds were measured at 1,000 Hz and 2,000 Hz in 38 subjects with normal hearing and in 107 subjects with a symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss. Acoustic reflex thresholds were approximately six dB better for ipsilateral vs. contralateral stimuli for both subject groups. High ipsilateral reflex thresholds were associated with larger static compliance values in the sensorineural hearing impaired subjects. Reversed reflexes (increasing compliance with muscle contraction) were observed for ipsilateral stimulation in five per cent (two) of the normal hearing subjects, and 23 percent (25) of the sensorineural hearing impaired subjects. The number of reversed reflexes was greater for subjects with higher hearing thresholds and higher ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds. The results suggest that quantitative use of the ipsilateral acoustic reflex requires additional research. At present it seems prudent to use ipsilateral acoustic reflex measurements as a qualitative rather than a quantitative tool, e.g. in confirming the status of one middle ear when the other has a conductive hearing loss. However, even this limited role has a considerable clinical potential.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds were measured at 1,000 Hz and 2,000 Hz in 38 subjects with normal hearing and in 107 subjects with a symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss. Acoustic reflex thresholds were approximately six dB better for ipsilateral vs. contralateral stimuli for both subject groups. High ipsilateral reflex thresholds were associated with larger static compliance values in the sensorineural hearing impaired subjects. Reversed reflexes (increasing compliance with muscle contraction) were observed for ipsilateral stimulation in five per cent (two) of the normal hearing subjects, and 23 percent (25) of the sensorineural hearing impaired subjects. The number of reversed reflexes was greater for subjects with higher hearing thresholds and higher ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds. The results suggest that quantitative use of the ipsilateral acoustic reflex requires additional research. At present it seems prudent to use ipsilateral acoustic reflex measurements as a qualitative rather than a quantitative tool, e.g. in confirming the status of one middle ear when the other has a conductive hearing loss. However, even this limited role has a considerable clinical potential.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds were measured at 1,000 Hz and 2,000 Hz in 38 subjects with normal hearing and in 107 subjects with a symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss. Acoustic reflex thresholds were approximately six dB better for ipsilateral vs. contralateral stimuli for both subject groups. High ipsilateral reflex thresholds were associated with larger static compliance values in the sensorineural hearing impaired subjects. Reversed reflexes (increasing compliance with muscle contraction) were observed for ipsilateral stimulation in five per cent (two) of the normal hearing subjects, and 23 percent (25) of the sensorineural hearing impaired subjects. The number of reversed reflexes was greater for subjects with higher hearing thresholds and higher ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds. The results suggest that quantitative use of the ipsilateral acoustic reflex requires additional research. At present it seems prudent to use ipsilateral acoustic reflex measurements as a qualitative rather than a quantitative tool, e.g. in confirming the status of one middle ear when the other has a conductive hearing loss. However, even this limited role has a considerable clinical potential.

Key concepts: Acoustic reflex, Audiology, Medicine, Reflex, Sensorineural hearing loss, Stimulation, Hearing loss, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ipsilateral acoustic reflex stimulation in normal and sensorineural impaired ears: a preliminary report. — Research Paper | ScholarLens