2014Journal of Indian Academy of Dental Specialist ResearchersRequires access

Tooth paste/tooth brush: Boon or bane for oral hygiene

M Selvamani, PraveenShivappa Basandi, Madhushankari, YamunaDevi Andamuthu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Sumerians practiced oral hygiene as early as 3000 BC and by the year 1600, Chinese had used bone handle with horse hair bristles as a toothbrush. Since then the toothbrush has undergone drastic changes. In the recent years, toothbrush has evolved in various types and designs based on its relation to shape, size, structure of bristle, material used for bristle, etc. In spite of all these advancements, toothbrush is still regarded as a carrier of bacteria especially Streptococcus mutans . Studies have shown that toothbrushes and paste are colonized by bacteria soon after use. The present study is carried out to determine the presence of microorganism in the toothpaste and used tooth bristles at 15 min and 24 h after brushing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sumerians practiced oral hygiene as early as 3000 BC and by the year 1600, Chinese had used bone handle with horse hair bristles as a toothbrush. Since then the toothbrush has undergone drastic changes. In the recent years, toothbrush has evolved in various types and designs based on its relation to shape, size, structure of bristle, material used for bristle, etc. In spite of all these advancements, toothbrush is still regarded as a carrier of bacteria especially Streptococcus mutans . Studies have shown that toothbrushes and paste are colonized by bacteria soon after use. The present study is carried out to determine the presence of microorganism in the toothpaste and used tooth bristles at 15 min and 24 h after brushing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sumerians practiced oral hygiene as early as 3000 BC and by the year 1600, Chinese had used bone handle with horse hair bristles as a toothbrush. Since then the toothbrush has undergone drastic changes. In the recent years, toothbrush has evolved in various types and designs based on its relation to shape, size, structure of bristle, material used for bristle, etc. In spite of all these advancements, toothbrush is still regarded as a carrier of bacteria especially Streptococcus mutans . Studies have shown that toothbrushes and paste are colonized by bacteria soon after use. The present study is carried out to determine the presence of microorganism in the toothpaste and used tooth bristles at 15 min and 24 h after brushing.

Key concepts: Brush, Dentistry, Oral hygiene, Medicine, Hygiene, Orthodontics, Engineering, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tooth paste/tooth brush: Boon or bane for oral hygiene — Research Paper | ScholarLens